It only makes enough sense to me if they are actively talking/pursuing something.
Yes. Also, if they wanted that "flexibility" then why set the precedent now? Wouldn't we have held guys out of summer league in previous years?
It only makes enough sense to me if they are actively talking/pursuing something.
Yeah. I wondered about that too. If they sign him, they have to wait 30 days before they can trade him. If they don't have a major deal worked out, I'd prefer them to just keep him for now and see how he fits. He's often compared to Boozer, but based on his skill set, I think a better comparison is Boris Diaw - who fits what Snyder does to the "T". If Lyles can bring to the Jazz what Diaw has brought to the Spurs. . . then he's a good pick at 12.Is sitting a guy out of the summer league worth whatever theoretical <1% chance that we need to use that extra $300k? I lean more toward a higher likelihood of thinking they can keep him in play as part of a trade.
that is an interesting point, but unless they've done an amazing job smoke screening everyone I don't think that is happening.
It only makes enough sense to me if they are actively talking/pursuing something.
Though summer league is just summer league, it's a pretty important opportunity to break in new guys. Holding someone out for something so hypothetical and infintismal doesn't add up.
This. Something is "on the table". Probably bases around a Trevor Booker trade. Would explain why Lindsey is getting short to reporters when asked about Trevor.
I remember rookies playing in the SL before signing their contracts, Tyler Hansborough was one.