What's new
By:

Trump is going to prison

How exactly does one serve an arrest warrant for the President?

Director of the FBI communicates with the director of the Secret Service for a takedown? Or does the FBI surround the white house and have a standoff?

I'm not sure there's protocol here.
 
Harambe said:
How exactly does one serve an arrest warrant for the President?

Director of the FBI communicates with the director of the Secret Service for a takedown? Or does the FBI surround the white house and have a standoff?

I'm not sure there's protocol here.
Click to expand...
It will not happen.
 
str8line said:
Envision Trump barricaded in the White House bathroom furiously tweeting his innocence while The FBI knocks down the door.
Click to expand...

I laughed. But at this point, wouldn't several marines and secret service personnel be disarmed and/or dead?
 
JazzGal said:
His tweet is pure gold as expected.

Click to expand...


I have not read the full indictment, but while watching CNN at the gym awhile ago, the commentators who had read it in its entirety said collusion was very much in play.

Then there are just the odds. Given his propensity to lie to an absurd degree, when you see him say "NO COLLUSION", what, 1000 times, lol, the odds that of course they colluded is virtually certain. Of course that's speculation, but assuming that "OK, this is the one thing he's being truthful about" just defies the odds, lol.
 
Saying get me the Wikileaks to Roger Stone is not collusion in the sense of it being a crime.

Good luck throwing Trump in jail.
 
Red said:
I have not read the full indictment, but while watching CNN at the gym awhile ago, the commentators who had read it in its entirety said collusion was very much in play.

Then there are just the odds. Given his propensity to lie to an absurd degree, when you see him say "NO COLLUSION", what, 1000 times, lol, the odds that of course they colluded is virtually certain. Of course that's speculation, but assuming that "OK, this is the one thing he's being truthful about" just defies the odds, lol.
Click to expand...

If you look at it in a vacuum of getting Stone as it's own individual case, Stone's got no chance. If and when a trial comes up, he's F'd in the A. But this indictment alone(with no official names other than STONE) doesn't sink the dawniebrooke. So for those of us that want to look at it like that, sure. Where dawniebrooke alone is concerned, what's been released is a nothingburder.

But when and if you make the connection that "our friend in London" and "at the Ecuadorian embassy in London" is Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks. And hear that the CIA, and many other intelligence agencies abroad confirm that the best intelligence connects the Russians with Wikileaks. And then temper that connection with Wikileaks (in)famously having a history of releasing very, very little information detrimental or critical of the Russian government... well at that point you understand that it's incredibly unlikely that our president isn't at least compromised, if not in bed with Putin.

I'm not a legal expert, but I'm pretty sure they'll, referring to anyone asking if there was collusion between dawniebrooke's campaign and Russia, consider all of the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top