What's new
By:

Trump's dictator to-do list

Bucknutz said:
So before you go on trying to tell everyone it’s Trumps fault, maybe you should blame the Democrats and RBG.
Click to expand...
What is funny about this one is it is basically saying "look, Trump has no option other than to nominate an extreme right-wing corrupt judge, everyone knows this, it is a force of nature, no way to stop it, so if you didn't want that, then you should have forced one of them to retire so Biden could nominate someone normal. See it is all the democrats fault we have a corrupt and stacked supreme court.". Like, why can't all presidents be expected to nominate the best people for the bench and not just their cronies? But we do live deep in the time of crony capitalism, and it is only going to get worse, so I guess it just follows that cronies will be everywhere. Still seems like a ****** way to view it.
 
Bucknutz said:
Let’s stop you right there. Whose job is it to select the Supreme Court nominee? The president. He didn’t stack anything, it was his choice who he gets to nominate.

Just because the democrats selected the 2nd worse candidate to run against Trump and she lost, got Trump 3 selections.

Trump didn’t stack ****, he was given the ability because of the Democrats. You can thank them. You probably want to thank them for probably replacing 2 more Right leaning judges with younger right leaning judges.

Also you should thank RBG for not retiring when a Democrat president was in power, so Trump could nominate someone instead.

So before you go on trying to tell everyone it’s Trumps fault, maybe you should blame the Democrats and RBG.

Next, when did Trump ever say he was going to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices? According to you, you need to show video proof of this happening. Keep your standard.

This is a left wing extremist view, please be accurate with what you’re saying.
Click to expand...

RBG and Biden, two morons who couldn't shelve their egos and do the right thing for their country.
 
Bucknutz said:
Let’s stop you right there. Whose job is it to select the Supreme Court nominee? The president. He didn’t stack anything, it was his choice who he gets to nominate.

Just because the democrats selected the 2nd worse candidate to run against Trump and she lost, got Trump 3 selections.

Trump didn’t stack ****, he was given the ability because of the Democrats. You can thank them. You probably want to thank them for probably replacing 2 more Right leaning judges with younger right leaning judges.

Also you should thank RBG for not retiring when a Democrat president was in power, so Trump could nominate someone instead.

So before you go on trying to tell everyone it’s Trumps fault, maybe you should blame the Democrats and RBG.

Next, when did Trump ever say he was going to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices? According to you, you need to show video proof of this happening. Keep your standard.

This is a left wing extremist view, please be accurate with what you’re saying.
Click to expand...
So then what are you talking about in your original post when you brought up stacking the supreme court with 9 more right wing justices? Maybe you meant to use the word "expand" or something?
 
LogGrad98 said:
What is funny about this one is it is basically saying "look, Trump has no option other than to nominate an extreme right-wing corrupt judge, everyone knows this, it is a force of nature, no way to stop it, so if you didn't want that, then you should have forced one of them to retire so Biden could nominate someone normal. See it is all the democrats fault we have a corrupt and stacked supreme court.". Like, why can't all presidents be expected to nominate the best people for the bench and not just their cronies? But we do live deep in the time of crony capitalism, and it is only going to get worse, so I guess it just follows that cronies will be everywhere. Still seems like a ****** way to view it.
Click to expand...
All trumps pics were cronies? You have proof of all of them being cronies? Or are you just not happy that Trump only picked right leaning judges. Did Biden pick a moderate? Or left leaning? You know how the game is played.

Again pick better candidates and then the court would have 4 left leaning justices than just 1.
 
Bucknutz said:
All trumps pics were cronies? You have proof of all of them being cronies? Or are you just not happy that Trump only picked right leaning judges. Did Biden pick a moderate? Or left leaning? You know how the game is played.

Again pick better candidates and then the court would have 4 left leaning justices than just 1.
Click to expand...
And again no responsibility for the Republican to choose good candidates, just the Democrats. Let the Republicans choose all the corrupt judges they want. To dismantle decades of legal precedent and provide the president with a loophole to avoid accountability for crimes. But if we want better judges well the Democrats better take care of that part.
 
LogGrad98 said:
And again no responsibility for the Republican to choose good candidates, just the Democrats. Let the Republicans choose all the corrupt judges they want. To dismantle decades of legal precedent and provide the president with a loophole to avoid accountability for crimes. But if we want better judges well the Democrats better take care of that part.
Click to expand...
Again, is it a bad candidate because you don’t like them?

You keep using the word corrupt; what Trump justice is corrupt? How and Why are they corrupt, please show evidence.

You like Bidens justice more, bully for you; there are millions that like Trumps 3 justices more than Bidens. Who’s to say who is a better justice.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
Stop reading articles. All I can tell you. And I can honestly say I’ve heard from him the exact opposite.
Click to expand...
Ya he contradicts himself all the time. Im just telling you one of the things that actually came out his mouth and you are choosing to not believe this thing that came out of his mouth and instead believe other different things that came out of his mouth.
 
fishonjazz said:
You what the horses mouth said (trump is the horses mouth in this case)? It (trump) said “Absolutely I’d revoke it (their legal status) and I’d bring them back to their country,” Trump told NewsNation.
Click to expand...
By the way this is out of context. If they break the law, commit crime they are gone and should be gone losing that privilege doing so on a none permanent status choosing to be criminals.
 
fishonjazz said:
Ya he contradicts himself all the time. Im just telling you one of the things that actually came out his mouth and you are choosing to not believe this thing that came out of his mouth and instead believe other different things that came out of his mouth.
Click to expand...
Video proof please and nothing taken out of context. This is one reason Trump won in a landslide
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
Video proof please and nothing taken out of context. This is one reason Trump won in a landslide
Click to expand...
I will make you a deal. I will provide video proof after you provide video proof of Kamala Harris saying she plans to give free sex change operations to inmates and immigrants.

Eh **** it. I will hook you up anyway even though I know you won't provide me with the video evidence I asked for.


View: https://youtu.be/Qvoc5RKBM9s?si=Le2ODxoQ8TqwxtGw



View: https://youtu.be/kMno19-HmxY?si=7TeTj4wSMNiaVpzT



View: https://youtu.be/K7i17bZnJeI?si=6oKqe7d9tiSJiIB2



View: https://youtu.be/_bTMacEGcLk?si=hufzqUGMe3EuyOoK






Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
Because none of it is actually true. I grew up and lived as a democrat, and was hoodwinked by the left wing media. Through trump’s, presidency and Biden’s saw that I was lied to. Every day all of us are lied to. Trump is no nazi, never was an enemy to democracy or freedom, and most certainly isn’t in this for his own gain. Just look at all the **** the democrats have put him through right after he put his name back in. Because of how bad Biden’s presidency has been.

What is absurd is letting men in women’s spaces using our hard earned tax dollars to allow illegals and inmates to get sex change operations for free. That’s what’s absurd and radical. The only thing radical about Trump is how he makes evil dictators feel so scared they stay in line, at least when he was president. He put the fear of god in them. That’s why there were no new wars then and so many now.

Yes Trump has an ego, but it’s that ego that helped us prosper for four years starting in 16 and why we the people will be put first now.

Trump isn’t going to disallow abortion, but leave it in the hands of whatever state you live in.

He wants immigration, but done legally, anyone breaking the law by coming over illegally should and will be deported by Trump and this country.

Every last thing said in that **** hole of a video is utter slander. I’ve been on both sides, so I know what I’m talking about.

Stop listening to left wing media and discover the truth yourself. Cost of living will go down foreign policy in America will improve meaning less violence and war around the world less need for American military in dangerous places by which apparently Kamala Harris didn’t know men and women of our military were stationed in such places.

If you are honest with yourself you will see what I did. We all saw what President Trump did in his four years in office. Did it look anything like what the media has been spewing the last few months did he trample on our freedom did burn the flag? Did he do anything to disrupt our country, the answer is only one thing no Yet that’s what Kamala Harris and other left wingers say he will do when he returns to the White House. any red blooded American with any kind of decency and moral compass will see all the lies in the Biden administration and the media from the left wing.
Click to expand...
People who want to control the masses through propaganda brainwashing must just be drooling at this kind of post. C'mon man, have some self awareness and introspection. You were all in on one side, and now you are ALL in on the other side. You have just fallen for the exact same thing again. In 10 years you'd be making a post about how you were hoodwinked by the MAGA movement.
 

The Pentagon anticipates major upheaval once President-elect Donald Trump returns to the White House, amid fears that the once and future commander in chief will follow through on vows to deploy the military domestically against American citizens, demand fealty from key leaders and attempt to remake the nonpartisan institution into one explicitly loyal to him.

The trepidation harks back to Trump’s first term, when he smashed norms and frequently clashed with senior Pentagon leaders — including several of his own political appointees. He has shown no signs of altering course this time around, stating throughout his campaign an intent to use military force against the “enemy from within,” to fire any military officer associated with the chaotic evacuation from Afghanistan after he left office in 2021, and to reverse what he and his supporters have denounced as “woke” decisions by the Biden administration that include renaming several Army bases that had honored Confederates.

“The greatest danger the military faces” under a second Trump presidency is a “rapid erosion of its professionalism, which would undermine its status and respect from the American people,” said Richard Kohn, a professor and military historian at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “Mr. Trump does not have a real understanding of civil-military relations, or the importance of a nonpartisan, nonpolitical military.”

Several senior figures in Trump’s first administration later issued public warnings about his authoritarian impulses. Among them were his former defense secretary Mark T. Esper; retired Gen. Mark A. Milley, his former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and his former White House chief of staff John Kelly, also a retired general. Jim Mattis, the retired general who was Trump’s first defense secretary, said little publicly during the election but castigated Trump in an essay in June 2020, calling him “the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people.”

While in office, each served as a bulwark against Trump’s darkest impulses and subsequently voiced grave concerns that he would violate the Constitution by issuing unlawful orders to the military.

The impulsive, antiestablishment nature of his presidency created uproar, including when he intervened in the criminal cases of U.S. troops convicted of war crimes, sought retribution against retired generals who criticized him and abruptly called for a ban on transgender service members but had no plan in place. Such moves often caught Pentagon officials flat-footed and left them scrambling to discern what exactly Trump wanted and whether he would change his mind.

As president, Trump used his personal social media to broadcast major U.S. troop movements overseas, including a withdrawal from northern Syria that caused chaos for partner forces there, and personnel reductions in Afghanistan while U.S. officials were simultaneously negotiating a departure with the Taliban. Doing so was seen by commanders as unconventional at best.

Earlier this year retired Gen. Austin “Scott” Miller, who oversaw U.S. forces in Afghanistan, recalled for House investigators scrutinizing the withdrawal how in 2018 he was awakened by a phone call informing him the military had been ordered to prepare to leave “in the middle of the night.” The general responded that doing so was “not feasible.”

The first Trump administration also worked to root out career civil servants who were suspected of undermining the president’s agenda or who spoke out when it appeared his directives were unlawful. A Defense Department official said Wednesday that while most career Pentagon staff and military personnel there seek to avoid politics, some now feel afraid based on their experiences during the hyperpartisan first Trump presidency, when chaotic decision-making and abrupt leadership changes at times made it difficult for them to do their jobs.

Trump, as commander in chief, has the authority to remove any senior military ranks at will. Such a move could risk political backlash from retired generals and lawmakers from both parties who evaluated and approved those nominations, but doing so also would allow him to appoint someone else he perceives to be more loyal to him and his agenda.

Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney, said her greatest concern for the military is if it is used to suppress dissent in the United States. While service members are required to follow U.S. law, all presidential orders stand to be interpreted by rank-and-file personnel as lawful even if they appear to fall in a gray zone, she said, with the possibility of disciplinary punishment for anyone who defies them.

“They will follow President Trump’s orders, particularly because the president can lawfully order domestic use of the military in a wide variety of situations,” VanLandingham predicted, calling the statutory limits on such force “easily legally surmountable.”

“There is huge risk in disobeying a president’s order, and seemingly little risk in obeying it,” she said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top