What's new

Tucker Carlson’s Rhetoric and White Replacement Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
White supremacists certainly recognize Carlson as echoing their talking points.


No, but you regularly exhibit a level of comfort with what they say.
I do if you make it your agenda.

**** the alt right.

Going back to the video, what did the Carston guy say that was white supremacy? I'm serious. Educate me.
 
Going back to the video, what did the Carston guy say that was white supremacy? I'm serious. Educate me.
A more complete rendition. Some might claim he is saying the Democrats want to make the United States less white....


And, since the situation on the border largely involves people from a triangle of Central American countries, it may be educational to examine our own history in that region:

 
If one can't hear the whistle on that one they'll never hear it.
Perhaps. Or perhaps people just need to become more familiar with the history of this type of rhetoric? I mean I have my doubts because Tucker’s racism is pretty obvious. But maybe people really are ignorant of these dog whistles?

White Replacement Theory:
White supremacists have been using this type of rhetoric for decades. For a long time they've claimed that elites (usually Jews) are trying to replace Christian white conservatives with immigrants. Remember Donald’s very fine people in Charlottesville chanting words to the effect of “we will not be replaced?”

So they’re fearful that Immigrants with a divided allegiance to America and traditional (white) conservative and Christian values will replace whites. While it may adjust its image (sometimes it’s blacks overrunning america, sometimes it’s muslims, sometimes it’s the Spanish speaking brown horde), it’s always the same message; there are enemies coming to overrun America and white conservatives must do everything to defend America from them. If they fail, then whites will be replaced and America will be beyond rescue.

Rep King got it:

Tucker’s rhetoric has impressed KKK members:

And is gaining recognition by VDare:
And is being used to justify Donald Trump’s “loss”, insurrection, and Republican efforts to suppress the votes through new election laws. Between Trump’s lying about the election being stolen and Tucker’s racism, they’re creating an even more fearful and paranoid base that believes that the country is headed towards war.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is written by a Republican:

And it’s not just a one time thing. He’s been preaching white supremacy for years. Saying that immigration makes our country poorer and dirtier is textbook white supremacy


Using such dehumanizing language was common in Nazi Germany and other mass genocides (like Rwanda). Labeling “the other” as socialist, atheist, not loyal, degenerate, immoral, etc helps white supremacists (or just anyone) justify their actions against their targets.

“Alien,” “Parasite,” “Degenerate”​

In order to make Jewish persecution publicly palatable, Nazi propagandists branded Jews as a biological threat to Germany. Government-sponsored racist propaganda was widely distributed denouncing Jews as “alien,” and “parasitic,” and responsible for Germany’s cultural, political, and economic “degeneration.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A more complete rendition. Some might claim he is saying the Democrats want to make the United States less white....


And, since the situation on the border largely involves people from a triangle of Central American countries, it may be educational to examine our own history in that region:

Good post
 
This is the kind of rhetoric that anyone with a conscience and/or a brain should choke at saying.

Used to be a "White Supremacist" would equate with a Lord Cecil Rhodes scheming to prevent "the darkies", as perhaps he would have called them, from asserting political power in the hinterlands of "civilization": or the "backwaters of society": as perhaps John Wesley Powell would have termed it..

In short, the founders of the Progressive movement. The very "woke" followers of this tradition today just won't intellectually address the place of a Sen. Byrd or a Fulbright in their tradition, or a Margaret Sanger.

The actual racists today are the "Woke Supremacists" and/or the Han 22nd Century Dynasty..... uhhhmm..... the Global Han Dynasty. I dunno, though. Maybe Xi is the puppet and maybe the Brits are still the puppet masters. The trouble with global schemes is just that it's so damn hard to know who's screwing whos.....uhhhmmmm.... except that it is always true that the ordinary citizens always get the shaft the worst.

Furthermore, it is standard training in the Marxist tradition to deploy activists on every side of an issue that is to be exploited politically. That means, when you hear Progressives piling on to accuse people of "White Supremacist" this or that, it is groups they have themselves set up, dressed in the lingo and/or garb appropriate to the genre. A sort of political pigeon, if you will, to be shot down by the Woke opposition. It's a puppet show, really.

I think there may be a few very small enclaves or lone household in the Northwest Woods who have fled there to preserve some ideal of White, but they are largely isolationists. They don't organize rallies or political groups. I've never heard of such a thing.

But all of a sudden, following Obama's lead on agitating the racial divide, which as a Marxist he is certainly woke up to do, we have "White Supremacists" everywhere the Woke Dummies look.

It's a farce.

The growing resistance to the Progressive takeover is populated with people of every stripe. It's just the fake Republicans like Romney and the fake Democrats like almost all the Dem leadership today that are on board with the agenda to transform America.

The more you push such fake narratives and fake issues, the more people you lose.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.
 
Most "Conservatives" or "Republicans" I have heard talking about these issues would be better described as believing it is "Republican Replacement Strategy" to bring in people from heavily Marxist-indoctrinated regions. They allege our "Wokesters" have groups down there with loads of cash organizing the Caravans and buying off Cartels to give them the pass. The idea here is the Dems know they need new dupes for their political base.

But the problem they face at a deeper level, on the longer term, is the number of these imported "Democrats' who are switching to Republican's.

And they're running out of dupes in Mexico or Central America. Now they're bringing them from other places too.
 
Used to be a "White Supremacist" would equate with a Lord Cecil Rhodes scheming to prevent "the darkies", as perhaps he would have called them, from asserting political power in the hinterlands of "civilization": or the "backwaters of society": as perhaps John Wesley Powell would have termed it..

In short, the founders of the Progressive movement.
This is true. The founders of the progressive movement were almost as racist their opponents. Almost.

The very "woke" followers of this tradition today just won't intellectually address the place of a Sen. Byrd or a Fulbright in their tradition, or a Margaret Sanger.
This is a lie. They recognize the racism of a Byrd (and his remorse) or a Sanger, just we do for Washington or Lincoln. That doesn't mean we ject everything done by these people.
 
Most "Conservatives" or "Republicans" I have heard talking about these issues would be better described as believing it is "Republican Replacement Strategy" to bring in people from heavily Marxist-indoctrinated regions.
These people are so Catholic, that if Republicans would welcome them with open arms, most would vote Republican on the abortion issue alone.
 
Back
Top