What's new
By:

Utah Trade Deadline Discussion

The Jazz can't stand pat at the deadline. Re-signing Hood and/or Favors would be a mistake. Letting Hood and Favors walk for nothing would be a mistake. Given that, moves must be made. It doesn't really matter if we've had a short stretch of success.
 
Ron Mexico said:
He passes the ball 41.3 times a game, which is about the same as Favors per game, although he plays less minutes than Favors. So he is not really a black hole. He receives 28.9 passes a game which is less than Favors, but about the same if you adjust for minutes.
Click to expand...
How does that add up? If he takes 12-ish rebounds and shoot 0 shots? Well, except steals I suppose.
 
SCS said:
The Jazz can't stand pat at the deadline. Re-signing Hood and/or Favors would be a mistake. Letting Hood and Favors walk for nothing would be a mistake. Given that, moves must be made. It doesn't really matter if we've had a short stretch of success.
Click to expand...

I tend to agree with this sentiment.
 
If Favors were to go to DL and say he wants back with the jazz, would that be better or worse for the jazz. I do like having one of Favors or Gobert in the game at all times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
If Favors were to go to DL and say he wants back with the jazz, would that be better or worse for the jazz. I do like having one of Favors or Gobert in the game at all times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

If Favors stays (which even I think can work depending on rotations and Favors' contract), Burks and/or Hood would probably need to go. I doubt we can afford to keep all three unless we intend on going well into the luxury for 2018-19.
 
SCS said:
The Jazz can't stand pat at the deadline. Re-signing Hood and/or Favors would be a mistake. Letting Hood and Favors walk for nothing would be a mistake. Given that, moves must be made. It doesn't really matter if we've had a short stretch of success.
Click to expand...

But they will stand pat. We need to see what we have when were healthy line again.....
 
Favors is here till the summer and we lose him for nothing. Rodney will sign a good offer sheet and the Jazz will match. We try to sign Niko, but he gets a more lucrative offer and were stuck with the same team minus Favors. Hope I'm wrong. I usually am.
 
LoPo said:
If Favors stays (which even I think can work depending on rotations and Favors' contract), Burks and/or Hood would probably need to go. I doubt we can afford to keep all three unless we intend on going well into the luxury for 2018-19.
Click to expand...

Personally, I'd like to see us keep Favors and trade Hood. I think Favors is more valuable to the success of the jazz winning games, and see Hood as a more valuable asset to bring in a player or pick or both. Even if we keep Favors, I'd like to see us get someone like Niko.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
hgb said:
How does that add up? If he takes 12-ish rebounds and shoot 0 shots? Well, except steals I suppose.
Click to expand...
I am not quite sure, those are the numbers posted on NBA tracking. I am sure rebounds is a part of it. I am guessing inbound plays are a part of that, along with turnovers. I am sure there are other situations. His is a fairly normalish ratio for Forwards.
 
NAOS said:
dude, you've been around a lot. You know there are about 3 or 4 distinct acts of dumbassery he is capable of. He'll always have at least one.
Click to expand...

If brainstorming ideas to improve our beloved Jazz is dumbassery, I am the biggest dumbass in here. When drowning, I always try to stay afloat rather than complain about the water.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top