Are you suggesting amnesty? You liberal weenie who spits on the graves of the founding fathers and tramples all over the constitution. Off with his head!
![]()
The Founding Fathers only cared about white rich land owners.
Are you suggesting amnesty? You liberal weenie who spits on the graves of the founding fathers and tramples all over the constitution. Off with his head!
![]()
LOL @ building a fence.
Why not ask Germany how well that worked out.
First, with the trillions of dollars spent accross the world you would think we could have spent a few hundred million and built a quality fence with checkpoints that would have solved the issue of harmful illegal immigration years ago. I realize this is a huge undertaking, however, with the amount of money we have committed to Iraq and Afganistan and the aid we have sent all over the world if we spent a fraction on this we would be able to pull it off.
Second, my fence comment aside, I think there is such a thing as harmful illegal immigration and unharmful illegal immigration. If someone comes to this country, obeys the rules, pays taxes, maintains health, car and other beneficial insurance, acts in responsible manner both in terms of behavior and finanically, and in general is not a drain on society I don't care where they are from, they are welcome here. In fact, I think they are an asset. In terms of harmfull illegal immigration, those that break the law, don't maintain health insurance and are a drain on society, I support deportation for those.
There is a solution for harmful illegal immigration. First, secure the borders. Second, create a guest worker program where they are given an orienation and continued training regarding what it takes to be a productive member of society. Create a registry for guest workers and mandate that they renew their "Guest Worker License" every year. If they break the law they get deported. If they don't maintain health and car insurance they get huge fines, etc. This would provide a way to manage the challenges that illegal immigration creates which is namely the drain on government and society resources if the people don't pay taxes and maintain insurance etc.
I also find it quite ironic that many of the people are acting in such an aggressive manner towards illegal aliens would consider Ronald Reagan to be a great president and in some cases a "hero". If they did some research they would find that Reagan actually had some very progressive policies and if I'm not mistaken (and I'm not) actually granted amnesty in 1986 to illegal immigrants.
To me, why even give out this list in the first place?
Why not create and distribute a list of companies that are hiring illegal immigrants? Why a list of men, pregnant women, and children? Instead of making threatening phone calls, how about we boycott those businesses, demand that laws be enforced, and basically force businesses to abide by the law?
If businesses cannot employ illegally, and illegals cannot find jobs here, then they'll stop coming and go back to their own countries.
Instead of asking those of darker skin pigmentation to show their papers, why not ask businesses to show that they are employing legally?
I think both this list and the AZ law misses the point completely. We don't need to attack races or individuals with this issue. Attack the reason why they're coming here. Attack businesses that are breaking the law. Is it because Republicans want to come across as "tough against illegals" while still allowing their buddies in the private sector go about as business as usual?
It all seems pretty hypocritical to me. IF the AZ governor really wanted to get tough on illegal immigration, she'd crack down on AZ's private sector which is creating such a demand for illegals. Think about all those golf courses, construction companies, hotels, and restaurants that are breaking the law. Of course, perhaps some of them contribute the most to her campaign. Hypocrisy anyone?
She'd also create stricter laws for substance abuse while increasing funding of education and prevention.
But that's just my way of seeing things. What do you guys think?
First, with the trillions of dollars spent accross the world you would think we could have spent a few hundred million and built a quality fence with checkpoints that would have solved the issue of harmful illegal immigration years ago.
I also find it quite ironic that many of the people are acting in such an aggressive manner towards illegal aliens would consider Ronald Reagan to be a great president and in some cases a "hero". If they did some research they would find that Reagan actually had some very progressive policies and if I'm not mistaken (and I'm not) actually granted amnesty in 1986 to illegal immigrants.
a fence can be climbed over be digged under and even go through it
so if these "illegals" make a 4 hour journy a fence will only prolong their journey for a couple of minutes or at most an hour hmmm nice solution there einstein. prolonging their journey will have less immigrants
you deserve the nobel price for something
It seems everyone is taking for granted that the problem is that people are here illegally and that our immigrations system is proper, just needs to be enforced better. I wonder how/why many of you came to that conclusion? That's not the conclusion I've come to, at all.
To whomever gave me a neg rep and called me a hack, I invite your response most of all.
Good point, Dutch.
I've got a better idea. We should build a railroad across the border, and promise them citizenship when they arrive.
After they get here, instead of welcoming them to the country, we'll just put them on a return train back into the Mexico.
Suckas.