unluckyseventeen
Well-Known Member
Shadowrun is still better than Reach. Reach is pretty fun, though. I'm not sure if I'll buy it. Good thing I have that gamefly buffer.
Graphics mean everything.
To adults, yes. To kids, no. My little brothers love the Wii and I can't stand it except for a couple of games.
Well, it's not because of the graphics, it's because it's perceived as a gimmicky, kids' machine, so a lot of developers make ****** games for it because they know parents will buy anything and kids will play pretty much anything.
As an adult, I could care less about a game's graphics. I still play Final Fantasy games from the PS1 era on my 42 inch TV at home. It looks like *** but it's all good because they are still great games. Anybody that says something to effect of "this game is good/bad because it's graphics are good/bad" really doesn't know much about quality video games, so consider their opinions to be rather untrustworthy.
I still play ps1 games every once and awhile and even NBA Live 2000 on my PC. But the wii is just to underpowered. I love the motion controllers and always wanted a powerful system at the same time that could play FPS like call of duty. The medal of honor that came out on the PC in 2002 (that i still play) has better graphics than COD 3 on the WII and runs alot smoother. Thank god for the PS MoveCant wait to see how they are used in 2K11.
Shadowrun is still better than Reach. Reach is pretty fun, though. I'm not sure if I'll buy it. Good thing I have that gamefly buffer.