You're a committed ideologue, though you won't define "marxism" coherently in a manner that distinguishes between the hundreds of variants. You make up definitions for everything, and if you don't care to do all that work there are thousands of people out there doing it in their own ways. I don't believe there is a cogent, concise, or distinct definition of "CRT". It exists only in the variant skulls of political agenda wonks who transiently find it useful somehow for a specific near-term goal or the larger ideal of breaking down an objectionable society by essentially bullying everyone.CRT is not being taught to undergraduate teachers, nor is it being worked in any curricula below the post-graduate level.
Which ideas have I pushed that are specifically central to CRT, as opposed to other social theories about race and oppression? When you find it impossible to name any, will you acknowledge as much?
So, who the hell knows what "Marxism" or "CRT" or any other variant form of political preachery really is. The whole idea of "change" or political transformation is deliberately shrouded in multiple plausibly denialed gobbledygooks.
The methodology is endless, it never reaches a goal. The real goal is the process, making use of the tool, the means of exercising power over a sheepish or disinterested ignorant public that is not yet aware of what is going on.
Theo only consistent thing I find in any of it is the strange fact that lying is loved for its wonderful effectiveness, and the occasional dupe like yourself who may sincerely believe he/she is working on some fundamental universal truth is often so damned brainwashed they'll never see the fact for what it is.
Trying to stay on topic in a thread in here is like playing whackamoley, ya know.
Last edited: