What's new

We can now legitimately reflect on Tony Bradley...

I feel like he's shown me enough where I'm okay with him being on the roster. Good rebounder, offensive potential. There's still things he needs to improve on. I don't want him on the floor in meaningful minutes (like playoff games). We're better with Ed at backup C, can't wait until he's back.
 
Like would Joakim Noah provide more winning basketball than Bradley? I think you’d have to say yes... and Noah is out of the league. It’s year three... I get he hasn’t had playing time but he’s had time with the stars... and playing time was always going to be tough to get with Rudy and Favs... and then bringing in competent backups because honestly he wasn’t ready for playing time...

WHICH IS WHY THE PICK NEVER MADE ANY DAMN SENSE!
 
Like would Joakim Noah provide more winning basketball than Bradley? I think you’d have to say yes... and Noah is out of the league. It’s year three... I get he hasn’t had playing time but he’s had time with the stars... and playing time was always going to be tough to get with Rudy and Favs... and then bringing in competent backups because honestly he wasn’t ready for playing time...

WHICH IS WHY THE PICK NEVER MADE ANY DAMN SENSE!
I hate it when people are right IN ADVANCE OF THE EVIDENCE (mostly because the masses take this as a license to go with their gut, and stick to their untested convictions), but it’s starting to look like the anti-TB crowd was right—on one way or another, and for one reason or another.

Even if he ends up being an NBA player, it looks like his timeline isn’t in-synch with the Jazz. Too-****ing-bad.

EDIT: it’s also clear that some people have better guts. Going with HH’s is obviously a pretty good idea.
 
If you play Bradley's production to Rudy's minutes their stats would be quite similar. I know the haters will not like that.
 
Back
Top