What's new

What are Republicans doing to Unify the country?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Can you do the math on that. What is it about inclusive voting policies that would mean that an actually more popular candidate would lose just because they are Republican?
Inclusiveness has nothing to do with the central issue other than it is the excuse used to defend the practice of allowing third party ballot collection, otherwise known as “ballot harvesting”. The practice is so effective that a highly organized ballot harvesting operation will consistently beat an organic vote even in cases where an opposing candidate has a sizable popular advantage. It is really, really effective.

 
Inclusiveness has nothing to do with the central issue other than it is the excuse used to defend the practice of allowing third party ballot collection, otherwise known as “ballot harvesting”. The practice is so effective that a highly organized ballot harvesting operation will consistently beat an organic vote even in cases where an opposing candidate has a sizable popular advantage. It is really, really effective.

So far there is no mention of illegal votes, votes by ineligible persons, manufactured votes, or vote tampering. We're just talking about an effective way to count as many ballots as possible. So why is ballot harvesting inherently favorable to Democrats?
 
How about we choose the lesser of two evils then? You in?
Evil is always a matter of perspective. From the perspective of every species we've driven extinct we are as evil as it gets. We put Hitler to shame if you consider just deaths of any organism.
 
So far there is no mention of illegal votes, votes by ineligible persons, manufactured votes, or vote tampering. We're just talking about an effective way to count as many ballots as possible. So why is ballot harvesting inherently favorable to Democrats?
Because of the way population density impacts the effectiveness of ballot harvesting. I've linked a deeper dive into the issue previously and can link it again if you'd like me to, but essentially population centers like urban areas and college campuses are easier for this practice to sway results.
 
Because of the way population density impacts the effectiveness of ballot harvesting. I've linked a deeper dive into the issue previously and can link it again if you'd like me to, but essentially population centers like urban areas and college campuses are easier for this practice to sway results.
Okay, well I'm cool with this counter to the many significant advantages our system gives to rural communities and small population states. The minority can no longer rule the majority, as it has been very often over the last 100 years.
 
Yes, and 2016 became the blueprint for how the system was changed. If you look at the 2016 vote totals and take out California, Trump beat Hillary by roughly 1 million votes.
You take out California and Texas, and Trump is wining again.

It is the vote totals in California where Hillary won by 4 million votes that swing the popular vote. When 2020 rolled around, every state that could set about making their systems more California-like and the results speak for themselves.
When were the laws changed in California?
 
Because of the way population density impacts the effectiveness of ballot harvesting. I've linked a deeper dive into the issue previously and can link it again if you'd like me to, but essentially population centers like urban areas and college campuses are easier for this practice to sway results.
Why don't Republicans harvest ballots in urban centers and college campuses?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
The laws were changed in California in 2016
Yet, the Democrats captured the same percentage of the California vote they had in 2008 and 2012, and did just little better in 2020 (all four were between 60-64%). Where was the marked improvement?
 
Yet, the Democrats captured the same percentage of the California vote they had in 2008 and 2012, and did just little better in 2020 (all four were between 60-64%). Where was the marked improvement?
BALLOT HARVESTING!!!!!

Angry-Man.jpeg
 
I have a tip for the Republican party.

Stop embracing white Christian nationalism

Stop banking on retirement age people being massively over-represented on election day. Times are changing and your base is dying.

Stop othering the LGBTQIA+ community.

Stop scapegoating Latino immigrants.

Stop objecting to education funding and support for families in need.

Once they've done that they can go ballot harvest with the best of them.

 
I have a tip for the Republican party.

Stop embracing white Christian nationalism

Stop banking on retirement age people being massively over-represented on election day. Times are changing and your base is dying.

Stop othering the LGBTQIA+ community.

Stop scapegoating Latino immigrants.

Stop objecting to education funding and support for families in need.

Once they've done that they can go ballot harvest with the best of them.


THIS!!!

Stop the fear, hate, and demonizing and get back to work in providing America with worthy candidates and ideas. Compete in the marketplace of ideas, don’t wreck it forcing your ****** candidates and unpopular ideas onto everyone else.
 
Back
Top