He had a rough start but has been better lately. At least what I have watched. Taking more threes is good and he started passing again. I’d say he’s trying to make some of the right improvements but is mostly the same.
That was half serious, half trolly ... but yah... he won't like what I'd be willing to offer. But... thinking about it... come on - lets be serious here. If he doesn't considerably improve his play to the end of the year - who would give him more than vet minimum? How is that type of play worth more than that?
I'm sure someone would, or maybe sign him to a 2 way. He still has good games even when he shots poorly. He is able to affect the game in multiple ways. Teams may convince themselves it was the team around THT and him playing PG that led to bad efficiency
I mean, its still better than the contract we gave Sexton....
For sure. I don't think they view it as a success or big failure, but i think given the chance to go back they likely would pass on it.
