What Price Should the Jazz Extend THT?

[Handlogten's Heros]

The money had to be enough that his and Markkanen`s contract could get close enough to Mitchell`s contract to make the trade legal. It had to be minimum three years, but not all years had to be guaranteed. We only guaranteed one year when we tried to put one over on the sixers when we made agreed to an offer sheet with Paul Reed.

Sexton`s contract looks fair at the moment and I can`t see any realistic scenario where it puts us in a tough spot.

When I wrote that it was before he went on a heater. As a starter he’s been fantastic. To be in a sign and trade I believe they have to have three guaranteed years so that it’s not just like the Keith van horn deal where they sign a one year deal for salary filler. Reed wasn’t in a sign and trade so no restriction.

I’d shop Collin a bit since his play has ticked up but I wouldn’t sell him for peanuts. I think JC coming off the bench has been better too. Seems they are both performing better which only helps things.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

When I wrote that it was before he went on a heater. As a starter he’s been fantastic. To be in a sign and trade I believe they have to have three guaranteed years so that it’s not just like the Keith van horn deal where they sign a one year deal for salary filler. Reed wasn’t in a sign and trade so no restriction.

I’d shop Collin a bit since his play has ticked up but I wouldn’t sell him for peanuts. I think JC coming off the bench has been better too. Seems they are both performing better which only helps things.

just keep starting him. I probably wouldnt look to trade him this year. If a trade happens that is good, great, but I would just try and boost his value this year as a legitimate starting PG on a team that isnt awful.

 

[Elizah Huge]

just keep starting him. I probably wouldnt look to trade him this year. If a trade happens that is good, great, but I would just try and boost his value this year as a legitimate starting PG on a team that isnt awful.

He’s not a PG he’s a SG.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

He’s not a PG he’s a SG.

Kind of semantics to an extent. If he's a starter on a team that is at least somewhat contending for a play-in spot someone could view him as a good gamble to be their starting PG.

 

[Elizah Huge]

Kind of semantics to an extent. If he's a starter on a team that is at least somewhat contending for a play-in spot someone could view him as a good gamble to be their starting PG.

I just think he’s better off as the secondary ball handler. Would work extremely well with someone like LeBron I think.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I just think he’s better off as the secondary ball handler. Would work extremely well with someone like LeBron I think.

Well yeah, of course, but no one is dying to have a 6'1 SG and most teams don't have a jumbo primary ball-handler.

Sexton's value is someone (like the Spurs/Pistons/Raptors) looking at their ****** guards and saying they need someone with some talent. "Yeah, Sexton might not be a PG, but he just started for the Jazz and they were better than us"

 

[Elizah Huge]

Well yeah, of course, but no one is dying to have a 6'1 SG and most teams don't have a jumbo primary ball-handler.

Sexton's value is someone (like the Spurs/Pistons/Raptors) looking at their ****** guards and saying they need someone with some talent. "Yeah, Sexton might not be a PG, but he just started for the Jazz and they were better than us"

I definitely think the Pistons are on the verge of making a trade out of desperation.

 

[KqWIN]

*whispers*

You don’t know ball

Haha...I would definitely bet against them getting paid their current salaries. They have been playing much better though, I'll give them credit for that.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I definitely think the Pistons are on the verge of making a trade out of desperation.

The Spurs are the easiest team to trade with.

The Pistons dont have anything I want. I would be shocked if they gave up a first for Sexton, and if they did it would have lotto protections on it and would it ever even convey? I wouldnt even take Ivey for Sexton in a straight up trade tbh.

Same thing with the Raptors. They just dont have great trade pieces and I doubt they would give up a first for Sexton. Would they give up Dick? He's been really really bad to start off, but I doubt they would want to give up on him yet.

The Spurs just have a lot of draft picks. Them throwing out a first for Sexton would make sense to me. Their guard play is also so awful, Sexton would be a massive upgrade for them. They have Devonte Graham's contract which makes matching salary with Sexton easy.

 

[Elizah Huge]

The Spurs are the easiest team to trade with.

The Pistons dont have anything I want. I would be shocked if they gave up a first for Sexton, and if they did it would have lotto protections on it and would it ever even convey? I wouldnt even take Ivey for Sexton in a straight up trade tbh.

Same thing with the Raptors. They just dont have great trade pieces and I doubt they would give up a first for Sexton. Would they give up Dick? He's been really really bad to start off, but I doubt they would want to give up on him yet.

The Spurs just have a lot of draft picks. Them throwing out a first for Sexton would make sense to me. Their guard play is also so awful, Sexton would be a massive upgrade for them. They have Devonte Graham's contract which makes matching salary with Sexton easy.

Do the Spurs want to improve their guard play this year? That’s the biggest question to me.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Do the Spurs want to improve their guard play this year? That’s the biggest question to me.

I mean, they are not going to out tank the Pistons. I can't imagine they want to be this bad.

 

[Elizah Huge]

I mean, they are not going to out tank the Pistons. I can't imagine they want to be this bad.

They don’t need to out tank the Pistons they will get the same odds as them as long as they stay in the top-3. What is the incentive for them to trade a pick for Sexton and move from the 2nd pick to like the 5th or 6th pick?