I'm a big fan of LotR (didn't care much for Rambo), and have not seen YTMT. However, you have a point here. Given a choice, YTMY is probably what I would prefer having them watch.
What's Worse?
- Thread starter GVC
- Start date
I'm a big fan of LotR (didn't care much for Rambo), and have not seen YTMT. However, you have a point here. Given a choice, YTMY is probably what I would prefer having them watch.
My kids also know that the sex in pornographic movies isn't real.
By comparison, Rambo was rated R, not PG-13.
In the US, you can't be rated NC-17 for violence or language. In other countries, you can be given the equivalent rating for violence (I'm not sure about language).
1. Can you make a connection between watching the movie and performing that action? Teens were having sex long before movies?
2. Why the age difference? Why didn't yo make them both 17, or both 14? Were you trying to stack the deck with your question?
Human tendencies don't matter in how we choose to censor and censure? I'm not about to jump on the video game violence leads to baby killers bandwagon.
I was just pointing out an extreme case which still falls within the definition of "consensual underage sexual relationship/act".
In some states, that age range (17 and 14) is illegal.
Exactly my point...
In some states there is a closeness in age exemption for statutory rape as big as 10 years.
Yeah, I didn't see how it made your point. Care to connect the dots?
*grabs popcorn and soda*