What's new

Where does Gobert rank out of the entire NBA ?

I don't like CP3 either. Yes, he is a great player, but he dominates the ball way too much. I don't think you can get deep into the playoffs when you have a guy that short dominating the ball every possession. That is what I hate about PG-centric offenses and why I'm glad Quin doesn't run that ish. You don't want your shortest player dominating the ball too much.

I actually disagree with you, and so do the numbers. His usage% this season is 23.4% (which is basically the same as his career average of 23.7%), good for just 83rd in the league. As far as playoffs, his usage didn't really increase, yet in the playoffs he has a CAREER average of 20/10/4/3 on 47%/46%.

Also, I dont care how tall they are as long as they produce... while having the 83rd usage% in the NBA,cp3 has the 2nd highest offensive win shares this season (and is near the top every season), while still having a defensive winshare rating 3x higher than our current 6 ft pg, leading to the 3rd highest win shares overall in NBA. not to mention he's perpetually near the top of BsPM, VORP,ft%,fta (for pgs), etc. etc.

To deny how transformative he was for that franchise is ignorant. He took the team from 32-50 (.390) to 40-26 (.606) in his first year there, with a very similar lineup. My point was that I would trade for him, because it would likely have the same effect on our team (who is currently slated to win a similar number of games).



Not if we give up Gobert to get him. I don't think people realize how crazy it is that other teams are struggling to get out of the 80's every time we play. No other player in the NBA gives you that. Very few players in NBA history give you that.

i agree, however we struggle to get out of the 80s too, to me its more about point differential than defensive pts allowed, and it's my belief that our success would drastically change in the playoffs, as teams could game-plan for Gobert much more thoroughly, and would shut our offense down HARD with the lack of scoring options. As much as a love Gobert (and i do), i still think there are a small number of players who would benefit this team more. CP3 included.
 
Last edited:
I actually disagree with you, and so do the numbers. His usage% this season is 23.4% (which is basically the same as his career average of 23.7%), good for just 83rd in the league. As far as playoffs, his usage didn't really increase, yet in the playoffs he has a CAREER average of 20/10/4/3 on 47%/46%.

Also, I dont care how tall they are as long as they produce... while having the 83rd usage% in the NBA,cp3 has the 2nd highest offensive win shares this season (and is near the top every season), while still having a defensive winshare rating 3x higher than our current 6 ft pg, leading to the 3rd highest win shares overall in NBA. not to mention he's perpetually near the top of BsPM, VORP,ft%,fta (for pgs), etc. etc.

To deny how transformative he was for that franchise is ignorant. He took the team from 32-50 (.390) to 40-26 (.606) in his first year there, with a very similar lineup. My point was that I would trade for him, because it would likely have the same effect on our team (who is currently slated to win a similar number of games).





i agree, however we struggle to get out of the 80s too, to me its more about point differential than defensive pts scored, and it's my belief that our success would drastically change in the playoffs, as teams could game-plan for Gobert much more thoroughly, and would shut our offense down HARD with the lack of scoring options. As much as a love Gobert (and i do), i still think there are a small number of players who would benefit this team more. CP3 included.

Nah, what you are missing is that defense keeps you in games. No matter how bad our offense gets, we are always right there with a shot to win the game. When you are down 20 it can zap your energy and make you want to give up. If you are always close then you will always keep fighting.

Remember how many times we had to try and stage a comeback with the Boozer and Memo teams? It was an issue that always plagued that team because Boozer and Memo couldn't guard the paint. It wore on them to always have to try and come back.

Also, you can rely on a great defense alot more than you can rely on a great offense. It's a hell of a lot more consistent. You can always play defense. Sometimes shots just don't fall.


It would be idiotic to trade the best rim protector in the league (Rudy) for Chris Paul.

I guarantee we will go further into the playoffs than Chris Paul's teams ever have. That's in large part to having two bigs that can play outstanding defense.


Besides all that, Rudy is inept on offense. He's going to be a good offensive player. Watch.
 
Also, you can't game plan for Rudy's defense. It's just there. You can't say we just aren't going to go near him, well you can, but it's not going to do you any good. Because the wings will just stay close to you and not let you shoot outside shots.



Defense greatness over offense everyday of the week× a million
 
Nah, what you are missing is that defense keeps you in games. No matter how bad our offense gets, we are always right there with a shot to win the game. When you are down 20 it can zap your energy and make you want to give up. If you are always close then you will always keep fighting.

Remember how many times we had to try and stage a comeback with the Boozer and Memo teams? It was an issue that always plagued that team because Boozer and Memo couldn't guard the paint. It wore on them to always have to try and come back.

Also, you can rely on a great defense alot more than you can rely on a great offense. It's a hell of a lot more consistent. You can always play defense. Sometimes shots just don't fall.


It would be idiotic to trade the best rim protector in the league (Rudy) for Chris Paul.

I guarantee we will go further into the playoffs than Chris Paul's teams ever have. That's in large part to having two bigs that can play outstanding defense.


Besides all that, Rudy is inept on offense. He's going to be a good offensive player. Watch.
Chris Paul had prime Tyson Chandler.
 
Nah, what you are missing is that defense keeps you in games. No matter how bad our offense gets, we are always right there with a shot to win the game. When you are down 20 it can zap your energy and make you want to give up. If you are always close then you will always keep fighting.

Remember how many times we had to try and stage a comeback with the Boozer and Memo teams? It was an issue that always plagued that team because Boozer and Memo couldn't guard the paint. It wore on them to always have to try and come back.

Also, you can rely on a great defense alot more than you can rely on a great offense. It's a hell of a lot more consistent. You can always play defense. Sometimes shots just don't fall.


It would be idiotic to trade the best rim protector in the league (Rudy) for Chris Paul.

I guarantee we will go further into the playoffs than Chris Paul's teams ever have. That's in large part to having two bigs that can play outstanding defense.


Besides all that, Rudy is inept on offense. He's going to be a good offensive player. Watch.


I agree with some of that. however i feel that as elite as rudy is on defense, cp3 is as elite on offense, and the numbers back that up. The numbers also actually suggest that our team defense is the cause for our success, as when Rudy leaves we don't see much of a drop off at all in defensive rating.
 
Also, you can't game plan for Rudy's defense. It's just there. You can't say we just aren't going to go near him, well you can, but it's not going to do you any good. Because the wings will just stay close to you and not let you shoot outside shots.



Defense greatness over offense everyday of the week× a million

draw Gobert to the perimeter every time (like a high 1-5 pr), and pump fake the hell out of him as he tries to recover.
 
draw Gobert to the perimeter every time (like a high 1-5 pr), and pump fake the hell out of him as he tries to recover.

He doesn't have to do that. He can switch. And Rudy isn't dumb. He's already looking good on playing that. He rarely goes for the pump fake.

Rudy's smarts is what makes him who he is. Lost of tall long guys have come through the league. I'm telling you, Rudy is really smart in the way he plays defense. It isn't just him blocking shots. He's making the right decision 99% of the time.
 
Chris Paul had prime Tyson Chandler.

And they were pretty good. He has Deandre Jordan now too. And that's why he's on good teams. Take them aways and they aren't very good.

Also, Rudy is a lot better defender than either one of them imo
 
He doesn't have to do that. He can switch. And Rudy isn't dumb. He's already looking good on playing that. He rarely goes for the pump fake.

Rudy's smarts is what makes him who he is. Lost of tall long guys have come through the league. I'm telling you, Rudy is really smart in the way he plays defense. It isn't just him blocking shots. He's making the right decision 99% of the time.

im not saying he isnt. but there are ways to lessen his impact. my point is that, perhaps a team defensive scheme is more important than an individual in having defensive success. ALL the championship teams in the last 8 years were top 10 offenses, AND top 10 defenses. My thinking is that CP3 and good team defensive concepts (like we are already showing) can achieve that more practically than expecting rudy to take some huge jump on the offensive end
 
im not saying he isnt. but there are ways to lessen his impact. my point is that, perhaps a team defensive scheme is more important than an individual in having defensive success. ALL the championship teams in the last 8 years were top 10 offenses, AND top 10 defenses. My thinking is that CP3 and good team defensive concepts (like we are already showing) can achieve that more practically than expecting rudy to take some huge jump on the offensive end

Rudy IS a great great team defender. He's helping everyone out on defense. Hes making the whole team play better defense. It isn't like he just racking up blocks to pad his stats.

It's not about the blocks. It's how he's positioning himself and helping others.
 
Rudy IS a great great team defender. He's helping everyone out on defense. Hes making the whole team play better defense. It isn't like he just racking up blocks to pad his stats.

It's not about the blocks. It's how he's positioning himself and helping others.

my point is that the numbers indicate that there isn't really much of a defensive drop off when he's on the bench. I anticipate that our defensive successes are related to team concepts and effort more than one individual (rudy), whereas offensive success CAN drastically change from one individual (cp3).
 
my point is that the numbers indicate that there isn't really much of a defensive drop off when he's on the bench. I anticipate that our defensive successes are related to team concepts and effort more than one individual (rudy), whereas offensive success CAN drastically change from one individual (cp3).

Damn man. I think you need to try an actually watch the game. Forget relying on analytics. That's really screwing you up if you think there is no difference between Rudy being on the bench and being in the game.

The proof is in the pudding. We are winning games and holding teams to less points. I'm not even sure what numbers you could possibly be looking at that suggest what you just said
 
Back
Top