What's new
By:

Who would you rather have?

Who would you rather have?

  • Player A

    Votes: 8 30.8%

  • Player B

    Votes: 15 57.7%

  • Player C

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Scott Padgett

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • Total voters
    26
We JC and DM or Conley spending time on the bench units they have firepower up they asses... I really wish we’d focus on putting defenders around them. I will give them a pass for no action at trade deadline put this summer there should be ample opportunity to put some finishing touches on the roster. Just don’t get guys that are completely helpless on offense like Ed.

Id feel so great about our roster if we had one more solid big man and one more solid wing.
 
NAOS said:
And he added 15lbs of muscle every offseason. This is ongoing.
Click to expand...
AK 47 was 12 feet tall and 975 lbs of solid muscle by the end of his career based on the media day reporting numbers.
 
infection said:
All per 36.

Player A:

41.2% FG, 35% on 6.1 3PA, 86.7% FT on 7 FTA, 3.7 rebounds, 7.1 assists, 23.2 points.

Player B:

48.7% FG, 38.6% on 8.5 3PA, 75% FT on 2.6 FTA, 3.9 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 22.9 points.

Player C:

45.9% FG, 30% on 3.1 3PA, 70.6% on 3.5 FTA, 4.7 rebounds, 3.3 assists, 11.5 points.
Click to expand...

Player A if I need someone to create on possessions, player B if I need a sharp-shooter, player C if I need better interior defense.
 
infection said:
Don’t forget the jump shot. He worked with Hornacek, after all.
Click to expand...
I'd fight it... then get sucked in to believing it... then be disappointed. I wish AK would have come along 10 years later. He'd have been a stretch, playmaking 4 all along... now he'd probably be a sometimes 5. AK and Sloan was a tough combination... I like them both, but personalities didn't mesh.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I'd fight it... then get sucked in to believing it... then be disappointed. I wish AK would have come along 10 years later. He'd have been a stretch, playmaking 4 all along... now he'd probably be a sometimes 5. AK and Sloan was a tough combination... I like them both, but personalities didn't mesh.
Click to expand...
And really it was Sloan that struggled to keep up as the game was changing. Taking away the illegal defense call basically gutted most of his offensive schemes. Tough to keep up with the changing times.
 
LogGrad98 said:
And really it was Sloan that struggled to keep up as the game was changing. Taking away the illegal defense call basically gutted most of his offensive schemes. Tough to keep up with the changing times.
Click to expand...
His hard nosed consistency made him great... kind of did him in towards the end. I love the man even though he is imperfect. The fouling too much and over controlling issues hurt us at the end. I’d also mention the fact that he didn’t like the three but that was a general coach thing at the time. I experienced it in youth and high school hoops... I often wondered if my coaches knew math.
 
infection said:
All per 36.

Player A:

41.2% FG, 35% on 6.1 3PA, 86.7% FT on 7 FTA, 3.7 rebounds, 7.1 assists, 23.2 points.

Player B:

48.7% FG, 38.6% on 8.5 3PA, 75% FT on 2.6 FTA, 3.9 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 22.9 points.

Player C:

45.9% FG, 30% on 3.1 3PA, 70.6% on 3.5 FTA, 4.7 rebounds, 3.3 assists, 11.5 points.
Click to expand...
I take player B.
Who are these dudes

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
LogGrad98 said:
Tough thing is it depends on the role. For a high volume bench guy who just needs to get points and keep the pressure on, then lower percentages can be ok. If it's a low post scorer who needs high efficiency, then percentages matter and make a bigger difference. And comparing like a gobert to a Mitchell will produce much different results when you don't know the context. From the stats alone I voted for B due to efficiency.
Click to expand...
Ya, this

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top