How do you compare it to the Spurs grabbing Rodman in the 90's except for the fact that he's not as good as Rodman? The fact he's not as good as Rodman kind of takes the whole "it could be like" out of equation doesn't it? If he's not as good as Rodman, then it could never be compared to when the Spurs got Rodman.
We might as well say, the Jazz getting Lance Stephenson is very similar to when the Wizards got Michael Jordan. Except for the fact that Stephenson isn't 1/20 the player that Jordan was. If you subtract the scoring, killer instinct, basketball IQ, defense, championships, greatness and everything else. Their practically the same player. It's almost the same!
Not trying to be rude, but the two players obviously can't be compared if their talent isn't even in the same galaxy.