Pretty sure you are the wrong one.
The guy with the ball on his hands is usually going to be the leader. 95% of the time this is the case.
Defensive minded guys who can't score on their own aren't really considered leaders. They can be an emotional leader or a "rah rah" type, but they aren't the guy who the team is going to turn to when the score is tied with 24 seconds left in regulation. That guy is the leader.
I think a good nickname for Burke is All Talk Trey.Trey Burke says he provides veteran leadership ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBiPwujz8j8
Having the most talent or the ball in your hands for the majority of the time does not make somebody a leader. To me, being a leader is about putting the team & your teammates ahead of yourself, doing whatever it takes to help your team win, supporting your teammates at all times & any cost, helping put them in a position to succeed, making them better (not only with your play, but with your presence/guidance), leading by example, knowing what needs to be said & saying it in a constructive manner, etc. While Hayward clearly has a lot of those qualities, imo Gobert best exemplifies what it means to be a leader out of the players on this roster. Hayward has undoubtedly been the unquestioned leader of this team since Jefferson & Millsap left via FA, but (again imo) Gobert took over that role at the end of the season.
In the end tho, I honestly don't believe that any of the players on this roster are thinking in those terms. The rest of the roster may have looked up to/followed the lead of Hayward, Favors, Gobert, Ingles, & Booker (to varying degrees), but imo one of the biggest factors in the chemistry/cohesion that the team displayed last season was largely due to the fact that the team (as a whole) views themselves as a collective unit rather than a collection of individuals following a specific leader. A team doesn't need one undisputed leader, it can follow the leads of different players in different situations. Imo, this is the main reason that the FO has targeted high-character players & it appears to be paying off.
San Antonio? Duncan has been the best player, but he's pretty quiet. Perhaps Parker was the leader or Pops? I really see it as a collective as karlmalone was getting at. SA players put the team ahead of themselves. Great example of that was their last championship season when no one averaged more than 30 mins or 17 pts/per in the regular season.I like this post, Mr. Mailman. How many NBA champions have there been without an undisputed leader?
Regarding Rudy vs. Gordon, if it were a pickup game and Gordon was on one side and Rudy on the other, which one would have more Jazz teammates wanting to join their team?
Trey Burke could definitely be a leader if he wasn't so ****ty at NBA basketball.
I like this post, Mr. Mailman. How many NBA champions have there been without an undisputed leader?
Regarding Rudy vs. Gordon, if it were a pickup game and Gordon was on one side and Rudy on the other, which one would have more Jazz teammates wanting to join their team?
The Spurs?
I know everyone probably would say Tim, but I don't think you can call him the undisputed leader over Parker or Ginobili. It's kind of a group leadership team.
I think most championship teams don't have an undisputed leader.
The Lakers had Kobe and Shaq.
The Warriors had Curry and Green.
The Heat had Wade and Lebron.
Mavs had Jason Kidd and Dirk.
Celtics had Pierce and Garnett.
The team with the most undisputed leader might be Kobe when he won with Gasol. I still consider Gasol a leader though since he seems pretty vocal and team oriented.