What's new

Why are gun owners afraid to admit they own guns?

the jewish faith support weapons!
also christianity






hitler was against private gun ownership. so was mao, so was stallin, so was pol pot!

Well, the bible says (Isaiah) that after dreadful wars and plagues reduce the population back to stone age conditions, people will have to recast their weapons into agricultural implements, while wearing gunny sacks for clothes, with most of the men killed off so women will have no men to help.

This is actually the ideal world the globalists seek. Only they're on the wrong side of history, believing the fantasies not the facts. They imagine they are the enlightened ones bringing progress to a world that needs destruction.
The UN armies will have plenty of guns we can turn into plowshares when they finally surrender to the peasants with their wooden pikes. I don't know how many more Pol Pots, Maos, Stalins, Hitlers, and Planned (un)Parenthoods it will take, but so far I don't see the end of it. The 500 million humans left on planet earth, according to the goals and agendas so far advanced, after the plans are accomplished, could be high by a factor of ten. The 'globalists' will run outta stooges and dupes, and the surviving Merkels will be hiding out in caves in the burned-out barrens.

It takes more population to keep airlines and high speed transportation running, and people will be walking everywhere, fighting for food, and won't giveadamn about globalism anymore.
 
yes the un was founded to prevent another tyranic0l reign like Hitler. but since the 60's all they wanna become is a hitler like rieghn. ofcourse hitler was voted into power. they are NOT.

WE MUST NOT SURRENDER OURSELF TO THE FALSE SONGS OF GLOBALISM!!!!!!!

The UN was set up by the same people who invested in Hitler and built his armament plants and concentration camps.

Who didn't like Patton for wanting to free Russia as well as Germany, and didn't like Stillwell for favoring Chiang Kai Shek in China over Mao.

Who made sure Russia got the bomb and enough German scientists to build missiles, and who brought enough
German scientists here to make it a "fair fight" all the way down to the last useless eater.
 
if there was some sort of globalizations. i want all borders to be kept and every single country would get the constitution of USA. and not make it a breathing living document!
i know it has imperfections(14th amendment and the 24th but even with those imperfections i would take it in a heartbeat!

seeing as a friend of mine served 3 years for self defense (2nd amendment)
and i got convicted for speech violations(luckily it was just a fine no jail-time)

it is a libertarians dream that fine constitution.

so don't you guys dare touch 2nd amendment!!!!


be happy with it and defend it with your live every amendment especially the 5th with the vault7 stuff!

trust me you don't know what you have till you lose it!
 
Well, the bible says (Isaiah) that after dreadful wars and plagues reduce the population back to stone age conditions, people will have to recast their weapons into agricultural implements, while wearing gunny sacks for clothes, with most of the men killed off so women will have no men to help.

This is actually the ideal world the globalists seek. Only they're on the wrong side of history, believing the fantasies not the facts. They imagine they are the enlightened ones bringing progress to a world that needs destruction.
The UN armies will have plenty of guns we can turn into plowshares when they finally surrender to the peasants with their wooden pikes. I don't know how many more Pol Pots, Maos, Stalins, Hitlers, and Planned (un)Parenthoods it will take, but so far I don't see the end of it. The 500 million humans left on planet earth, according to the goals and agendas so far advanced, after the plans are accomplished, could be high by a factor of ten. The 'globalists' will run outta stooges and dupes, and the surviving Merkels will be hiding out in caves in the burned-out barrens.

It takes more population to keep airlines and high speed transportation running, and people will be walking everywhere, fighting for food, and won't giveadamn about globalism anymore.

I think it's cute that you have such a simplistic cartoon image of your imaginary enemies. You could certainly argue that their policies and philosophical outlook will lead to the horrors you mention, but you really think "globalists" seek to destroy this world? Like just if they really admitted what they wanted it would be humanity enslaved?

So like if there was another path to the enslavement of humanity they would abandon their current ideology and switch to something completely different, just so long as it lead to their goal of a world police state of enslaved people?

I mean you don't sound like you're kidding, but what you're saying is a joke.
 
from personal experience we didn't have to go that far.

holster the weapon or hold it in a neutral way in your hand!


als take of your shirt
put the shirt on the ground and your gun on the shirt. and hands up so they see there is no other gun concealed on you.

Strip naked. Shoot the now distracted bad guy. Put your gun on your pile of clothes. Lay down on the ground. Got it.
 
The use of a open carry or concealed weapon is something that would happen in an instant. Your life would be threatened and you would just have to react. If you're in a situation and there is someone with a gun it is not like you bust out your gun and go hunting them down. You get yourself to cover and prepare to defend yourself. If the police arrive you put your stupid gun down, your hands up and you thank them for their service.

People with a concealed (or open) weapon have not been deputized to engage in a prolonged firefight with armed "bad guys" (hate that stupid term, btw).
 
The use of a open carry or concealed weapon is something that would happen in an instant. Your life would be threatened and you would just have to react. If you're in a situation and there is someone with a gun it is not like you bust out your gun and go hunting them down. You get yourself to cover and prepare to defend yourself. If the police arrive you put your stupid gun down, your hands up and you thank them for their service.

People with a concealed (or open) weapon have not been deputized to engage in a prolonged firefight with armed "bad guys" (hate that stupid term, btw).

so i should not put my awesome gun down? because i don't own any stupid guns, mine are awesomely EPIC
 
So you're saying someone who goes into a public place with a weapon intending on hurting people is not a bad guy. Got it.
 
So you're saying someone who goes into a public place with a weapon intending on hurting people is not a bad guy. Got it.

I think the whole "good guy/bad guy" thing is dumb.

You're free to call a person a bad guy all you want. I'm not saying they aren't a bad guy. I just think using that term the way it is popularly used is dumb.

I think you'll be able to get over my feelings about the term.
 
so i should not put my awesome gun down? because i don't own any stupid guns, mine are awesomely EPIC

Bunch of nitpickers up in here.

My point is that a lot of people romanticize these scenarios and envision themselves as a hero in some epic shootout.

The fact is that first, you are not law enforcement. Your gun is for the protection of life and limb in a situation where there is an imminent threat. So if someone pulls a gun and is threatening people with it and you are right there armed with a concealed carry gun you can draw and fire at the threat. Game over.

If that threat is around the corner and down the street you absolutely should not put yourself in harm's way by drawing your weapon and charging in. Anyone who thinks that's what carrying a gun is all about needs to grow the **** up. Both sides, pro-gun and anti-gun. Both sides need to understand that is not what carrying a gun is all about.

If you can get to safety then get to safety and be prepared to defend yourself. If you can help others get to safety you should do that within reason.

There is really no scenario where you're going to have a prolonged running gun battle with "bad guys." None.
 
I think the whole "good guy/bad guy" thing is dumb.

You're free to call a person a bad guy all you want. I'm not saying they aren't a bad guy. I just think using that term the way it is popularly used is dumb.

I think you'll be able to get over my feelings about the term.

Funny you think I'm the one with "feelings" about the topic when you're the one who freaked out over what amounts to semantics.
 
Funny you think I'm the one with "feelings" about the topic when you're the one who freaked out over what amounts to semantics.

Freaked out? I used the term "bad guy" in my own post and I mention that I think it's a stupid term to use.

Also, I said that you will be able to get over -->my<-- feelings on the subject.

We good? Did I piss you off somehow? Are you super attached to using the term "bad guy" and took my comment personally? I'm not getting what's going on here.
 
Back
Top