SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Wow, thanks for taking the time to point that out, Salty.
My point still stands.
Yeah I wasn't disagreeing with you or anything. Just happened to have both websites up on the where to play tabs when I read your post.
Wow, thanks for taking the time to point that out, Salty.
My point still stands.
I suspect the amount of money leaving Utah for lotteries in other states is truly miniscule. Do you have any data on that?
Actually, that seems like a pretty miniscule amount of money leaving the state to me, comparatively speaking.
Actually, that seems like a pretty miniscule amount of money leaving the state to me, comparatively speaking.
Why raise taxes if you don't have to? I'm sure most people would rather not pay any extra in taxes. And if anyone wants to pay more in taxes, nobody is stopping them.
I didn't miss it, but to be honest, I figured the 42 states that have lotteries probably have a better idea of what's cooking than franklin does. It IS franklin, by the way.
It says that 7% of all Idaho lottery sales are to Utah residents. And that was 3 years ago, with the number growing every year. And again, it is not factoring in the Arizona and Colorado lottery sales to Utah residents.
It didn't seem minuscule to me. If that money was going to Utah lottery sales instead, maybe we could afford to put air conditioners in the schools.
9 million dollars! Man, we could build at least a half-dozen speed bumps if we kept that money in Utah.
Keep in mind that 9 million in sales does not equal 9 million in tax revenue.
The schools have needed air conditioners forever. This isn't some new development. Utah is among the last in the nation when it comes to spending on schools. If you want to raise taxes, raise them. It doesn't mean we can't have a lottery. But I'm sure if there was a statewide vote that said "lower taxes and legalize a lottery" or "raise taxes and keep lotteries illegal" the lottery would be legalized by a landslide. People might historically support a progressive tax, but people also historically (and currently) support lotteries in almost every state.Historically, Americans have supported progressive taxes. You've been told many times already that lotteries are regressive. Besides, if we decide something must be paid for then why should we also decide to fund it voluntarily (and regressively)? If it's worth paying for and must be done at the state level then shouldn't most stakeholders have some skin in the game?
The economics of it right now say millions of dollars are leaving the state every year. It is all going to Idaho, Colorado, and Arizona. Those states get paid every time a Utah resident buys a lottery ticket there. They also withhold state (and federal) income tax from the big winnings. And they keep all of the unclaimed winnings (not big enough for someone to drive all the way there to claim).Is this 43 state co-op a political creation or built by beaurocratic economists? Most people don't sit down and produce a cost-benefit analysis before voting for something that sounds good to them. I've found many if not most economic choices politicians sell and voters make only account for one side of the ledger.
9 million dollars! Man, we could build at least a half-dozen speed bumps if we kept that money in Utah.
Keep in mind that 9 million in sales does not equal 9 million in tax revenue.