What's the point of going after someone just defending themselves? I could see that if the moderators took care of the initiator, then maybe it would makes sense to not have to defend yourself. But here on JazzFanz that's not the case. In fact, any punishment for the initiator is deliberately hidden from everyone. That's if anything is even done at all. Day in and day out there are the same people on here attacking other people for what they say. They apparently are not discouraged from doing because they keep doing it, and are still here. So from the standpoint of the person being attacked, why cant they attack back? I've never understood the reason for going after the person who strikes back. What sense does that make? All this just points to an unfair, and unjust system put in place to cater to certain people, and certain ideas. JazzFanz is not fair and free place of ideas, to put it as simply as I can. Moderators pick and choose who they want to have a voice. Including themselves.