What's new

Wikipedia Blackout: Websites Wikipedia, Reddit, Others Go Dark Wednesday to Protest SOPA, PIPA

Right way to protest?

  • No. This won't do anything

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    18

HipHopAnonymous

Active Member
Do not try to look up "Internet Censorship" or "SOPA" or "PIPA" on Wikipedia, the giant online encyclopedia, on Wednesday. SOPA and PIPA are two bills in Congress meant to stop the illegal copying and sharing of movies and music on the Internet, but major Internet companies say the bills would put them in the impossible position of policing the online world.

Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, says his site will go dark for the day on Wednesday, joining a budding movement to protest the two bills.

"This is going to be wow," Wales said on Twitter. "I hope Wikipedia will melt phone systems in Washington on Wednesday. Tell everyone you know!"

Several sources said members of Congress, reacting to the online objections, were pulling back on parts of SOPA and PIPA to which Internet companies object. But the protest movement continued for the time being.

Other sites, such as Reddit and Boing Boing, have already said they would go dark on Wednesday. And some of the biggest names online, including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr, have vocally opposed the proposed legislation.

PIPA, the Protect IP Act in the Senate, and SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, have been presented as a way to protect movie studios, record labels and others. Supporters range from the Country Music Association to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

But the Internet giants say the bills could require your Internet provider to block websites that are involved in digital file sharing. And search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing could be stopped from linking to them -- antithetical, they say, to the ideal of an open Internet.

"If you want an Internet where human rights, free speech and the rule of law are not subordinated to the entertainment industry's profits, I hope you'll join us," said Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing.

Wikipedia, the sixth most visited site in the world, said its English version will be dark for 24 hours Wednesday, urging users to contact Congress. Other joiners of the movement include Mozilla, which offers the Firefox Web browser; the Wordpress blogging site; and TwitPic, which allows Twitter users to post images online.

The House bill is on hold for now, and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D.-Vt.), who sponsored the Senate version, said he would be in favor of further research on provisions that have raised objections from Internet service providers. The White House over the weekend said it had reservations about the approach the two bills take.

"While we believe that online piracy by foreign websites is a serious problem that requires a serious legislative response, we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet," wrote three White House managers, including Aneesh Chopra, the U.S. Chief Technology Officer.

"Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small."

It has become a battle pitting Hollywood against Silicon Valley -- movie studios and music publishers want to stop the theft of their creative work, but Internet companies do not want to be cast as the police force.

"There isn't one technology company or venture capitalist who supports these bills," said Markham Erickson, the executive director of NetCoalition, a trade group for Internet firms, in an interview with ABC News.

"An 'Internet blackout' would obviously be both drastic and unprecedented," NetCoalition said in a statement. "We hope that the Senate will cancel its scheduled vote on PIPA so that we can get back to working with members on how to address the concerns raised by the MPAA [Motion Picture Association of America] and others without threatening our nation's security or future innovation and jobs."

Rest of article here: https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/w...rk-wednesday-protest/story?id=15373251&page=2
 
It would mean something if Amazon, Ebay, Walmart, and other sites that you either make a purchase or download some content participated.
If I don't have access to Wikipedia for a day, I think I can handle it.

I agree that the government, at the request of special interest groups, spends too much time trying to control what people do.
We should not pass these laws.

Anyone with kids knows it's way too hard to follow up on a million family rules. You can have them, but you really can't enforce them all, all the time.
It's the same with government.
With too many laws and rules, it will cause an undue burden to be placed on anyone trying to enforce them.
Choose the most important laws, and focus on them.
Simplify.
 
I've been using wiki and google all day today -- go figure. Google put a black box on their logo... wow, way to go out on a limb fella's.
 
I actually really like the blacked out Google logo - I think they should stick with it. Who would've known after years of attempted "cutesy" logos on every holiday and such, that just a nice black bar over the logo seems to be the best design their $100000 + programmers/designers have ever come up with.
 
I've been contacting my California Senators and representatives about this. I got the following stock reply from Senator Dianne Feinstein:

I received your letter expressing opposition to the "Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act," commonly known as the "PROTECT IP Act." I appreciate knowing your views on this matter.

The "PROTECT IP Act" (S. 968) gives both copyright and trademark owners and the U.S. Department of Justice the authority to take action against websites that are "dedicated to infringing activities." These are websites that have "no significant use other than engaging in, enabling, or facilitating" copyright infringement, the sale of goods with a counterfeit trademark, or the evasion of technological measures designed to protect against copying.

The bill does not violate First Amendment rights to free speech because copyright piracy is not speech.

America's copyright industry is an important economic engine, and I believe copyright owners should be able to prevent their works from being illegally duplicated and stolen. The protection of intellectual property is particularly vital to California's thriving film, music, and high-technology industries.

I understand you have concerns about the "PROTECT IP Act." While I voted in favor of this bill when it was before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I have also been working with California high-technology businesses to improve the bill and to address the concerns of high-tech businesses, public interest groups and others. I recognize the bill needs further changes to prevent it from imposing undue burdens on legitimate businesses and activities, and I will be working to make the improvements, either by working with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) or through amendments on the Senate floor.

On May 26, 2011, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the "PROTECT IP Act" for consideration by the full Senate. Please know I will keep your concerns and thoughts in mind should the Senate proceed to a vote on this legislation. As you may be aware, Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) has introduced similar legislation, the "Stop Online Piracy Act" (H.R. 3261), in the House of Representatives.

Once again, thank you for sharing your views. I hope you will continue to keep me informed on issues of importance to you. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841.

Wishing you a happy 2012.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

The line that gets me is the one that I've bolded. Clearly she has no understanding of the wider ramifications of this bill, and of the ways it harms legitimate websites by proxy. It just makes me mad. The crazy thing is that because these senators are all older folks, and have aids that do such a large part of their work for them, many of them simply don't even understand what the internet is and does. To many of them it's an abstract idea rather than a reality. It's just yet another way in which these fat cats are failing to represent the common citizen.

Of course, hardly a surprise that both CA Senators currently support this bill. I'm sure Hollywood has given them oodles of money.

In case anyone's interested, here's a list of SOPA supporters and opponents in Congress:

https://projects.propublica.org/sopa/
 
And now a word from SOPA:

██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████ ▓▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓ ▓█ █▓▓▓████▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓███ █▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓ ▓▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓ ▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ███ █▓▓█ █▓▓ ▓██ ██▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████ ▓▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ██ ██▓ ▓█ █▓▓▓████▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓███ █▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓ ▓▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓▓█ █▓▓ ▓████▓▓ █▓▓█ █▓██ ████▓ ▓█ █▓▓▓██ ██▓▓█▓▓█ █▓██ ████ ▓▓█ █▓▓ ▓██

This has been a word from SOPA. Thank you.
 
91c9b891-3755-4281-aa4d-787e3ddfeb4f.jpg
 
Better watch out. The next Reid 5,000 page budget authorization act will have all the objectionable provisions inserted, in the broadest possible language, maybe providing for a "War on Piracy Act" with a 250,000 square foot computer database center right behind the one the Patriot Act authorized for collecting and categorizing all internet data bytes and ranking them on some as yet unspecifiec criteria for suspiciousness.

Orwell never imagined how technology would enable these nutjobs to impose a totalitarian nightmare beyond anyone's comprehension.
 
Better watch out. The next Reid 5,000 page budget authorization act will have all the objectionable provisions inserted, in the broadest possible language, maybe providing for a "War on Piracy Act" with a 250,000 square foot computer database center right behind the one the Patriot Act authorized for collecting and categorizing all internet data bytes and ranking them on some as yet unspecifiec criteria for suspiciousness.

Orwell never imagined how technology would enable these nutjobs to impose a totalitarian nightmare beyond anyone's comprehension.

Or I guess you could just never use the internet and have no worries. its got a ways to go to reach Orwellian proportions.
 
What's funny is that even without the bill, the gov't has been, and will continue to use the technology to catch people. This was simply a way to make it "legal". To think that by shutting this bill down will stop any of the BS, you're nuts.
 
What's funny is that even without the bill, the gov't has been, and will continue to use the technology to catch people. This was simply a way to make it "legal". To think that by shutting this bill down will stop any of the BS, you're nuts.

They will still get it passed in some form wrapped in veil of Anti-terrorism/child porn protection bill.
 
Back
Top