What's new

Will there be American invasion in Syria?

You obviously do not understand the simple fact that what gives modern currency value is the use of said currency. The US doesn't have to own Iraqi oil in order to run a perpetual deficit without destroying her currency. The US just has to make sure that whoever sells the oil demands US dollars as payment. Since the 1970's anybody who wanted to buy oil had to have dollars.

So if an Italian buys oil that is imported from Saudi Arabia they first must convert their Euros into dollars. This means that Italy must have a large reserve of US dollars in order to import oil. If Italy were in the future forced to buy oil in say yuan her central bank would have to sell dollars and buy yuan. The effect is the yuans purchasing power increases while the dollars purchasing power decreases. i.e. China becomes more powerful while the US becomes less so.

Power comes from productive capacity, not some symbolic medium of exchange. The world reserve currency status is nothing but a drag on our internal production, and losing that could do nothing but strengthen us, even if it means losing this pretend power over oil imports. Besides, buying in USD is a convenience for these other nations; it's not a requirement. Show me that the Chinese or Norwegians MUST purchase Iraqi dollars in USD and I might give this little theory some consideration. People buy and sell in USD because we are the consumption powerhouse of the world which makes it much easier to get the goods they want with their new found wealth. In other words, we provide liquidity. Iraq could never spend all the Yuan they could get from China by exclusively selling their 8 or whatever mmbd production to China. So everyone deals in dollars, and Euros, and whatever else they need to convert to on the floating currency exchanges to balance payments into the local currencies they are selling and buying from.

The only reason we benefit from running a huge trade deficit, which lowers inflation at the expense of jobs here, is because all these nations want to leach off of our immense consumption capacity instead of becoming internally efficient themselves. Anyone who blames their actions, which we lobby until we are blue in the face to stop, are ill informed.

Every American should take jobs over short run inflation any day. More jobs = demand for labor = pay raises. These will more than offset inflation and become a net benefit to working society. And we can more than cover the COLA to transfer payment recipients as Treasury revenue will be bolstered while welfare/retraining/unemployment costs are lowered.

You obviously do not understand the simple fact that what gives modern currency value is the use of said currency.

If you're going to troll on this subject you might as well log in with your regular account and ask questions directly. Bord knows I like to talk about it so trolling never works me up more than it gives me an opportunity to collect my thoughts and put them on paper. So thank you.
 
China has been accused of keeping the value of their currency artificially low.

I don't get it.

We don't want to run trade deficits and have the world rely on us for their economies to flourish. The benefit, however, is that historically the surplus economies have the most to lose in trade wars or when things rebalance naturally or through coordinated government intervention. This is because relying on others for jobs (consumption) does your nation no favors when the tide turns. See Japan post Plaza Accords (the 30 year stagflation) and the US during the Great Depression (clinging to the gold standard when every other country was abandoning it, and healing after doing so, had plenty to do with it as well. But when external demand came back it stayed at home).

Another example is if we quit allowing China to dump goods then their economy would crater, and so would the price of damn near every commodity. Is $1.50 gas going to scare anyone into world reserve currency status is gone induced coma? China knows this which is why they are taking massive steps to rebalance by pushing internal demand upwards. It's a difficult thing for a state driven economy to do. Change must come gradually or things go helter skelter.
 
Power comes from productive capacity, not some symbolic medium of exchange.
Ther are roughly 25,000 man hours in one gallon of oil.
The world reserve currency status is nothing but a drag on our internal production, and losing that could do nothing but strengthen us, even if it means losing this pretend power over oil imports.
Wrong.
The only reason we benefit from running a huge trade deficit, which lowers inflation at the expense of jobs here, is because all these nations want to leach off of our immense consumption capacity instead of becoming internally efficient themselves.
So we are good at consuming? Are you really this slow? What gives us our ability to consume more than we produce?
Every American should take jobs over short run inflation any day. More jobs = demand for labor = pay raises.
Jobs and raises will cause inflation. Srs wtf R U talking about.
If you're going to troll on this subject you might as well log in with your regular account and ask questions directly. Bord knows I like to talk about it so trolling never works me up more than it gives me an opportunity to collect my thoughts and put them on paper.
Your thoughts are anything but collected. This is my only account. I am not trolling you. You made a ridiculous statement about US companies not getting contracts as if it were relevant to the state of the dollar.

P.s. I am drunk but that doesn't make me a troll.
 


Should you believe all that, you actually make my other point, of how Ronald Reagan was a quack and possibly the worst president since Ulysses S Grant.

That being said, you're also going down the path of "because past leaders have enabled it, it's totally ok to ignore it now". Isn't that a lot like acknowledging the failures you've had in the past and because you made those mistakes, not fixing them in the future?

You're still ignoring the bottom line. There are chemical weapons being used. Someone needs to take action to do it, US or UN, or Bob the builder. Even if it's exactly as you think it is, we can't do anything about what happened in the past. All we can do is clean it up.

Lets identify these declassified documents, certify that they are 100% real and not read out of context, and then make sure key members of the Reagan and Bush administrations serve time. I'm all for that. Should that be the case, assuming everything you're posting is 100% founded and true, great do it. It'll show the world that once in a while that tin foil hat has a grain of truth to go on. Good for you. Good for the US.

But even if this is all an illuminati conspiracy, identifying that it is a conspiracy does exactly NOTHING for the problem we have now.
 
Last edited:
A few quick things. If heyhey isn't heyhey who is he? I get so tired of trying to keep up with all of the alts and splits and fakers and trollbots.

Franklin, I got a good laugh off your 10 beer rants. Quite different than the 10 beer response I'm used to seeing. You didn't even threaten to kick my *** once. Impressive. Maybe that comes at 18 beers? Anyway, you seem like a smart guy, maybe someday when you sober up you can see it my way? I'll help you make your hat, instead of tinfoil we'll use beer cans. Probably not huh.

As far as 'my crowd' I'm not part of a crowd that I am aware of. I'm just a bitter old man who has been jaded by a lifetime of watching people lie and spin to get theirs. People will say or do almost anything to get thier way--kids for candybar, adults for couple hundred bucks. To that, even people on this board go through the pains of creating ALT identiites just to get a little advantage in a completly virtual world. Nothing in my experience says that once a person reaches a certain level of political power or postion that he then abondones the lying, spinning, and cons that got him there. If anything as the stakes get bigger so do the lies.

So if being skepitical makes me a nutter in some peoples opinion so be it. In the case of war and violence and death. I'd rather make a mistake of being a skeptic and promoting peace than banging the drums of war.

El Roacho. The bigger picture for me that is being ignored is the rebels. If the US starts blowing away at Assadd do the chemicals end up in the rebel's hands? Do we know who they are? Are they are 'friends' like the Libyan rebels were our friends? The rebels in Syria have shown no kindness to ehnic minorities or Christians. US destabalizing the country could lead to more genocide and attrocities.
 
El Roacho. The bigger picture for me that is being ignored is the rebels. If the US starts blowing away at Assadd do the chemicals end up in the rebel's hands? Do we know who they are? Are they are 'friends' like the Libyan rebels were our friends? The rebels in Syria have shown no kindness to ehnic minorities or Christians. US destabalizing the country could lead to more genocide and attrocities.

It's more than fair to ask that question. But it's looking like Assad wants to give up those chemical weapons to the UN. And if that's the case, and there will be no chemical weapons in Syria's hands, we won't have to start asking that.
 
It's more than fair to ask that question. But it's looking like Assad wants to give up those chemical weapons to the UN. And if that's the case, and there will be no chemical weapons in Syria's hands, we won't have to start asking that.

No he doesn't. He wants to buy time and trusts the Russians to protect him.
 
No he doesn't. He wants to buy time and trusts the Russians to protect him.

It appears the tinfoil hat is now on the other head.

We need to give him every chance in the world to cooperate. Even if it means letting him buy some time.
 
It appears the tinfoil hat is now on the other head.

We need to give him every chance in the world to cooperate. Even if it means letting him buy some time.

I never accused you of wearing tinfoil. Also I agree that we should give him a chance. I am also realistic that Assad will only do it if he feels he has no other option.
 
Should you believe all that, you actually make my other point, of how Ronald Reagan was a quack and possibly the worst president since Ulysses S Grant.

That being said, you're also going down the path of "because past leaders have enabled it, it's totally ok to ignore it now". Isn't that a lot like acknowledging the failures you've had in the past and because you made those mistakes, not fixing them in the future?

You're still ignoring the bottom line. There are chemical weapons being used. Someone needs to take action to do it, US or UN, or Bob the builder. Even if it's exactly as you think it is, we can't do anything about what happened in the past. All we can do is clean it up.

Lets identify these declassified documents, certify that they are 100% real and not read out of context, and then make sure key members of the Reagan and Bush administrations serve time. I'm all for that. Should that be the case, assuming everything you're posting is 100% founded and true, great do it. It'll show the world that once in a while that tin foil hat has a grain of truth to go on. Good for you. Good for the US.

But even if this is all an illuminati conspiracy, identifying that it is a conspiracy does exactly NOTHING for the problem we have now.
I don't believe in the ****in Illuminati. I am not some quack conspiracy theorist. I simply am not afraid to see the truth. Most US actions have been fueled by greed. I at first found Obamas gung ho approach perplexing because the "National Interest"(by this I mean financial interest) was not at first clear. What has been going on in the Sudan and the Congo is far worse than this. I don't buy for a second that this is about Chemical weapons.

If I am wearing a tin foil hat then you are wearing a blind fold.
 
Back
Top