Will there be American invasion in Syria?

[candrew]

Looks like Russia is only concerned with covering for Syria and doesnt really care about the chemical weapons. They want their cake and eat it too.

Shrewd move - and if we were in their position we would do the same exact thing. If Russia confiscates their chem weapons and The US/UN goes ahead and bombs Syria anyway Putin would look like a total clown. LOL - what does he do then? Give them back their chemical weapons?

 

[Gameface]

Shrewd move - and if we were in their position we would do the same exact thing. If Russia confiscates their chem weapons and The US/UN goes ahead and bombs Syria anyway Putin would look like a total clown. LOL - what does he do then? Give them back their chemical weapons?

He would look like a clown? Wouldn't we look like war mongering hypocrites? I mean, if they give up the chemical weapons what is our justification for an attack?

 

[candrew]

He would look like a clown? Wouldn't we look like war mongering hypocrites?

LOL - did you miss the last decade.

We are war mongering hypocrites. At least we appear that way to at least 80% of the world right now

I mean, if they give up the chemical weapons what is our justification for an attack?

Said Saddamm Hussein in 2002

 

[Gameface]

LOL - did you miss the last decade.

We are war mongering hypocrites. At least we appear that way to at least 80% of the world right now



Said Saddamm Hussein in 2002

Why would the make Putin look like a clown? He would look like he tried to be reasonable and the U.S. just went ahead with attacks that weren't going to be stopped regardless of facts.

Saddam had been bluffing that he STILL had chemical weapons after he impeded the UN weapons inspections that were supposed to clear him. But history has been rewritten on that, so what do I know?

 

[mellow]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KraNwTSC9Vs

4.4% of the people in America suffer from this disorder. It's not all that surprising we have more than average here I guess.

Oil backed dollars and the agreements the US has with OPEC countries is fairly well known and reported on, hardly a paranoid conspiracy as you suggested.

Might I friendly suggest that you take a few minutes to learn about it before you start throwing mud at heyhey. Wikkipedia Petrocurrency.

Libya was promoting terror for years, but the US paid it little attention until Gaddaffi tried to establish a Gold backed currency for trading oil in northern africa and set up oil leases with China.

 

[franklin]

Oil backed dollars and the agreements the US has with OPEC countries is fairly well known and reported on, hardly a paranoid conspiracy as you suggested.

If you're going to claim something is not a paranoid conspiracy, you probably shouldn't follow that up with...

Might I friendly suggest that you take a few minutes to learn about it before you start throwing mud at heyhey. Wikkipedia Petrocurrency.

Libya was promoting terror for years, but the US paid it little attention until Gaddaffi tried to establish a Gold backed currency for trading oil in northern africa and set up oil leases with China.

...a paranoid conspiracy theory.

At any rate, I LOVE conspiracy and read it as pseudo-history entertainment akin to Dan Brown novels. If you have any links they will be appreciated.

 

[franklin]

BTW, Mellow, how does your crowd explain away the fact that Iraqi oil fields went to the lowest possible bidder --some China-- at around 80 cents USDollars instead of high profits to US multinationals?

The war was all about oil for the Rockeefeelers n Halliburton and dem petrodollars yes?

 

[franklin]

BTW, Mellow, how does your crowd explain away the fact that Iraqi oil fields went to the lowest possible bidder --some China-- at around 80 cents USDollars instead of high profits to US multinationals?

The war was all about oil for the Rockeefeelers n Halliburton and dem petrodollars yes?

US is war mongers. They'd never do something altruistically like this.

 

[Harambe]

Just because you think they're out to get you, doesn't mean they aren't.

As i stated earlier, theoretically this could be right. Theoretically, this could just be another play for oil, like the war in iraq with bush sr., and the war in iraq/afghanistan from junior.

But of those three wars, there is clearly more evidence that there should be intervention now than ever before.

More over, even if the men with the money came out and blatantly said that this is what it is, the fact that chemical weapons are being used alone is a good enough reason to intervene.

So whether or not you'd like to wear the tin foil hat, i might be able to care less... but I'm not sure how.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[♪alt13]

BTW, Mellow, how does your crowd explain away the fact that Iraqi oil fields went to the lowest possible bidder --some China-- at around 80 cents USDollars instead of high profits to US multinationals?

The war was all about oil for the Rockeefeelers n Halliburton and dem petrodollars yes?

You obviously do not understand the simple fact that what gives modern currency value is the use of said currency. The US doesn't have to own Iraqi oil in order to run a perpetual deficit without destroying her currency. The US just has to make sure that whoever sells the oil demands US dollars as payment. Since the 1970's anybody who wanted to buy oil had to have dollars.

So if an Italian buys oil that is imported from Saudi Arabia they first must convert their Euros into dollars. This means that Italy must have a large reserve of US dollars in order to import oil. If Italy were in the future forced to buy oil in say yuan her central bank would have to sell dollars and buy yuan. The effect is the yuans purchasing power increases while the dollars purchasing power decreases. i.e. China becomes more powerful while the US becomes less so.

 

[Gameface]

You obviously do not understand the simple fact that what gives modern currency value is the use of said currency. The US doesn't have to own Iraqi oil in order to run a perpetual deficit without destroying her currency. The US just has to make sure that whoever sells the oil demands US dollars as payment. Since the 1970's anybody who wanted to buy oil had to have dollars.

So if an Italian buys oil that is imported from Saudi Arabia they first must convert their Euros into dollars. This means that Italy must have a large reserve of US dollars in order to import oil. If Italy were in the future forced to buy oil in say yuan her central bank would have to sell dollars and buy yuan. The effect is the yuans purchasing power increases while the dollars purchasing power decreases. i.e. China becomes more powerful while the US becomes less so.

But since China owns massive amounts of US debt the value of that debt also drops. If it costs 1 million dollars for a gallon of milk, for instance, the U.S. could simply sell it's gold reserves for yuan and based on the conversion rate to dollars we'd pay off everything we owe and still have money left over for a pizza party.

China has been accused of keeping the value of their currency artificially low.

I don't get it.

 

[♪alt13]

Just because you think they're out to get you, doesn't mean they aren't.

As i stated earlier, theoretically this could be right. Theoretically, this could just be another play for oil, like the war in iraq with bush sr., and the war in iraq/afghanistan from junior.

But of those three wars, there is clearly more evidence that there should be intervention now than ever before.

More over, even if the men with the money came out and blatantly said that this is what it is, the fact that chemical weapons are being used alone is a good enough reason to intervene.

So whether or not you'd like to wear the tin foil hat, i might be able to care less... but I'm not sure how.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using JazzFanz mobile app

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HvuUSRhpXE
https://tv.msnbc.com/2013/09/05/odonnell-reagan-let-saddam-buy-and-use-chemical-weapons/
https://on.aol.com/video/report--u-s--helped-saddam-as-he-used-chemical-weapons-517911850
https://theweek.com/article/index/248745/how-the-us-helped-saddam-hussein-use-chemical-weapons-against-iran"]https://theweek.com/article/index/248745/how-the-us-helped-saddam-hussein-use-chemical-weapons-against-iran[/URL]
https://rt.com/news/us-chemical-weapons-portnaya-152/
Me and my tin foil hat...

and the facts.