What's new
By:

Will there be American invasion in Syria?

Stoked said:
It is truth. No matter how much I wish it to be so I recognize that not everyone else wants that same thing. I hope for it to but i am under to delusion that it will happen.

The human race if truly united would be the most powerful thing on this planet. Think what we could accomplish with all that unneccesary crap out of the way.
Click to expand...

Stoked said:
No I am sincere honest. My point is that because of the world we live in there will always be a group/nation that feels the need to be dominate. To be the most powerful. How they are dominate could change. Thru military, religion, economic oppression...but there will always be that strive to be that group no matter what.

My point is that there are a vast amount of reasons behind why a group could reach for that dominance.
Click to expand...

You are just thinking too conventional and unprogressive. Just looking at the leaps of advancement of human history, it took thousands of years to edge certain basic epochs, then it took just a few centuries to make industrial revolutions and then computing and communication eras came.

Lol, the whole world is just now beginning to get to know each other in a real manner. Internet and the communication possibilities of the new times is essential of a future that could be build by the whole world for the whole world. I believe in that future and would work for it, not deny and renounce it(or even the possibility of it) from the rough.
 
Enes CanTear You Apart said:
You are just thinking too conventional and unprogressive. Just looking at the leaps of advancement of human history, it took thousands of years to edge certain basic epochs, then it took just a few centuries to make industrial revolutions and then computing and communication eras came.

Lol, the whole world is just now beginning to get to know each other in a real manner. Internet and the communication possibilities of the new times is essential of a future that could be build by the whole world for the whole world. I believe in that future and would work for it, not deny and renounce it(or even the possibility of it) from the rough.
Click to expand...

Tell you what, if at some point this happens and you are right and people are able to put aside their differences than I will whole heartedly take you for drinks. With a giant smile on my face.

As for advancement. Yes things have dramtically changed over human history. B ut some things never change. Such as religious and tribal (countries now) strife.
 
Stoked said:
Tell you what, if at some point this happens and you are right and people are able to put aside their differences than I will whole heartedly take you for drinks. With a giant smile on my face.

As for advancement. Yes things have dramtically changed over human history. B ut some things never change. Such as religious and tribal (countries now) strife.
Click to expand...

Whoa, whoa, let me make it clear, sir. I didn't promise it in your life time. We will both die in the same crappy world of today.

On the other hand, we can still go for some drinks. No homo and I will have just some apple juice. We could argue whether some things never change or not while we are drinking.
 
Enes CanTear You Apart said:
Whoa, whoa, let me make it clear, sir. I didn't promise it in your life time. We will both die in the same crappy world of today.

On the other hand, we can still go for some drinks. No homo and I will have just some apple juice. We could argue whether some things never change or not while we are drinking.
Click to expand...

Apple juice it is! A jug for each of us and we can talk about whatever lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
I'm not sure why we keep thinking this world is getting worse and worse. Maybe it's because of Christianity's influence?

We are about the only world power that still feels like starting wars. All the others from centuries past, Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Russia, Great Britain, and Japan have stopped doing that. I guess world domination isn't as attractive as it was 500... 200... Or 50 years ago. Yet, we keep thinking that "the end" is right around the corner.

If anything, the world is less violent and more tolerant than before.
 
I don't see us letting Syria decide its on fate is us backing down from Russia. This isn't the Cold War where we are measuring each others wang. Lets get over that. The USA letting Syria decide is progress. It is a sign of strength not weakness. It is a display that we are finally learning from the past and moving on from that mentality which dominated so much of the past century.

If Russia wants to get back to its imperialist/expansionist ways, have at it! Same thig with china! Have at it bros! You'll quickly be reminded on how expensive it is to occupy a country.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/us/politics/obama-syria.html

The Administration looks to be forging ahead with some form of military response despite:

Over whelming public resistance to Syrian intervention. Rueters had a poll showing support for an intervention was at 9%! Britain voting against intervention. UN Security Council not agreeing on a resolution. Rebels including groups like Al Qeada.

Insane.
 
Obama is saying it's cool because no American boots on the ground. Personally I think killing people from a distance and having no skin in the game is pretty disgusting. In no way do I want a single U.S. soldier to die in Syria, but if it isn't worth sending troops, if the mission is not vitally important for the security of the U.S., then it's a situation we should stay out of completely. This idea that it's okay as long as we're killing by remote control and not in person is terrible.
 
So they say since Assad is responsible for chemical weapon use and killing over 1400 innocent people ( including 400 children) he must be punished. But how? Missile strikes or air force strikes which will undeniably injure or kill more innocent people!? How is that some kind of justice? Are USA so precise with they distance weapons that they can just target Assad's personal residency or forces? Somehow I doubt it.
 
AKMVP said:
So they say since Assad is responsible for chemical weapon use and killing over 1400 innocent people ( including 400 children) he must be punished. But how? Missile strikes or air force strikes which will undeniably injure or kill more innocent people!? How is that some kind of justice? Are USA so precise with they distance weapons that they can just target Assad's personal residency or forces? Somehow I doubt it.
Click to expand...

They are that precise. They won't target him though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top