What's new
By:

Will there be American invasion in Syria?

But who gave the right to USA to attack independent country? Syria did not do anything to USA, so whatever is happening within their country should be their problem and should be left for their government and people to deal with. Sooner or later any dictatorship fails - if Assad is so bad he will lose support of most people and will be gone anyway. Just stay out.
 
AKMVP said:
But who gave the right to USA to attack independent country? Syria did not do anything to USA, so whatever is happening within their country should be their problem and should be left for their government and people to deal with. Sooner or later any dictatorship fails - if Assad is so bad he will lose support of most people and will be gone anyway. Just stay out.
Click to expand...

Something tells me that if this was happening in your country and your family and fitness were dying you'd be all for the US intervening...
 
AKMVP said:
But who gave the right to USA to attack independent country? Syria did not do anything to USA, so whatever is happening within their country should be their problem and should be left for their government and people to deal with. Sooner or later any dictatorship fails - if Assad is so bad he will lose support of most people and will be gone anyway. Just stay out.
Click to expand...

This is perhaps an example of how the UN has corrupted the world and made the world "safe for international fascist/corporate operations". The US, acting as the delegated policeman/jackbooted thug for the UN( or perhaps NATO, whichever organization will give the order) can go out and do whatever it is asked to do by these supra-national "authorities" who have no electoral legitimacy as "government" representing us.

Under the US Constitution, the President needs a declaration of war from Congress, hopefully based on some actual threat to our national sovereignty and/or Constitutional form of government. For decades now, since the creation of NATO and the UN, we have been ignoring our Constitution and acting under the pretense of authority from these organizations.

It's time for the US to end participation in these fascist organizations.
 
I stumbled upon an interview of Assad from late 2012. It is pretty interesting to say the least, kept me from sleeping for another half hour. I absolutely don't agree on some of his reasoning but there are some spot on ideas of him. Regardless it's a good video to at least grasp some of the points of his side of the story, up to the date of the interview of course.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdH4JKjVRyA
 
Stoked said:
Something tells me that if this was happening in your country and your family and fitness were dying you'd be all for the US intervening...
Click to expand...

You know that USA did nothing when USSR attacked and occupied my country for more then 50 years so why I would be hoping for anything like that? Maybe because we do not have oil or where to small and insignificant?
See, I think USA/UN/NATO had all rights to punish Iraq after they invaded Kuwait since it was aggression against other country. Since it is civil war in Syria - stay out, let them figure things out within their borders.
 
The US and the West are in a bad position here from a humanitarian standpoint.

If they stand back and let a bunch of people get killed/mutilated with chemical weapons, people are going to whine that they didn't intervene to save innocents...much like in Rwanda. If they intervene, people are going to whine that they are butting into the internal affairs of another country. Unfortunately there's no easy solution (and that the whole situation tends to be more complex than the humanitarian aspect).
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIEBH2Kln1U&list=PL7Vq61pMJqQCikbwXX8QTbsv-Usofp_dF&bpctr=1378052337&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DWIEBH2Kln1U%26list%3DPL7Vq61pMJqQCikbwXX8QTbsv-Usofp_dF%26bpctr%3D1378052337&has_verified=1
 
How do we even know if chemical gas was used? And who used it?

Anyone familiar with WWII and Germany's invasion of Poland knows how easy it is to deceive others into war.

In Syria, you are either supporting a jerk dictator who may or may not have used chemicals. Or an Al-Queda backed rebellion who may or may not have set up a horrible scene to drum up support for their civil war.

For us, you're deciding to support the best of 2 evils. I say, screw this and don't support anyone. Let the 2 duke it out.
 
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have all offered their "military assets" for a strike on Syria.
 
Stoked said:
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have all offered their "military assets" for a strike on Syria.
Click to expand...

They should go for it and let us know how it goes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top