What's new
By:

Will there be American invasion in Syria?

I think sanity might just prevail and we do not get involved. Maybe hopeful thinking...
 
The Thriller said:
Ok... 3 questions:

1. Who the hell supports this war? I don't know of a single lefty that wants this. Not even the biggest Obama fans I know want anything to do with Syria. And repubs have to be against him by default. So who other than senile McCain and maybe Michele, who supports this?

2. Why? Simple question. I know of some pretty big BS going on along the Mexican border along with some nasty stuff happening in the ghettos of Rio. If our job is to be the moral police of the world, why aren't we in those areas? Hell, Detroit might be the most dangerous place on the planet. Why not chuck a few tomahawk missiles there?

3. Does Congress go along with it? The House in particular?
Click to expand...

McCain and Graham in the Senate are on board. Boehner in the House is on board. That is some heavy hitters on the republican side. They will sway some votes. So much for that theory.
 
Names that have been listed as supporting a strike on SYria:

Reid
Pelosi
Beohner
McCain
Feinstein
Cantor
Graham

Looks like leadership on both sides are gettign behind the President. What are thinking?!?!
 
The Thriller said:
Ok... 3 questions:

1. Who the hell supports this war? I don't know of a single lefty that wants this. Not even the biggest Obama fans I know want anything to do with Syria. And repubs have to be against him by default. So who other than senile McCain and maybe Michele, who supports this?

2. Why? Simple question. I know of some pretty big BS going on along the Mexican border along with some nasty stuff happening in the ghettos of Rio. If our job is to be the moral police of the world, why aren't we in those areas? Hell, Detroit might be the most dangerous place on the planet. Why not chuck a few tomahawk missiles there?

3. Does Congress go along with it? The House in particular?
Click to expand...

Regional War deconstructing the Islamic world and bringing a third of the planet into the golden light of secular humanism and modern scientific enlightenment according to the dictates of Anglo-American intellectual leadership has long been in the sights of global managers with tools like NATO and the UN and the whole CFR menagerie of "thinkers". Prominent in this global agenda are the English monarchy and their camp followers, leading Western banking establishments, and western military/industrial moguls,

War is good for business, and the more people that can be just bombed to smithereens is just that much of notch in the campaign to reduce golobal population to some manageable level. . . .

So, you see, since Jimmy Carter, and even before that I'm sure. . . . there has been a reason we sent our "intelligence" agencies's darkside ops folks over there to give money to the Islamists and build up there extremist (aka "pushers" or "change agents") agitators. . . . .and that is why even Obama is doing everything possible to build up "the other side". How can you really have an effective war without another side to it?
 
babe said:
Regional War deconstructing the Islamic world and bringing a third of the planet into the golden light of secular humanism and modern scientific enlightenment according to the dictates of Anglo-American intellectual leadership has long been in the sights of global managers with tools like NATO and the UN and the whole CFR menagerie of "thinkers". Prominent in this global agenda are the English monarchy and their camp followers, leading Western banking establishments, and western military/industrial moguls,

War is good for business, and the more people that can be just bombed to smithereens is just that much of notch in the campaign to reduce golobal population to some manageable level. . . .

So, you see, since Jimmy Carter, and even before that I'm sure. . . . there has been a reason we sent our "intelligence" agencies's darkside ops folks over there to give money to the Islamists and build up there extremist (aka "pushers" or "change agents") agitators. . . . .and that is why even Obama is doing everything possible to build up "the other side". How can you really have an effective war without another side to it?
Click to expand...
Yep and we sent the CIA back in time to write the Koran. After that we sent them back in time again to divide the Islamic people into different sects and get them at each others throats. Then Aliens showed us how to turn their land into desert so we went back in time again to do that. Then we made a giant gummi bear that we used to try and catch us a magic whale so that he would grant us a wish and we could become the most powerful nation in the world.

Then the Jews sent their secret service back in time to start the Holocaust and when John Lennon found a memo proving all of this to be true they shot him.
 
Last edited:
heyhey said:
Yep and we sent the CIA back in time to write the Koran. After that we sent them back in time again to divide the Islamic people into different sects and get them at each others throats. Then Aliens showed us how
Yep and we sent the CIA back in time to write the Koran. After that we sent them back in time again to divide the Islamic people into different sects and get them at each others throats. Then Aliens showed us how to turn their land into desert so we went back in time again to do that. Then we made a giant gummi bear that we used to try and catch us a magic whale so that he would grant us a wish and we could become the most powerful nation in the world.

Then the Jews sent their secret service back in time to start the Holocaust and when John Lennon found a memo proving all of this to be true they shot him.
Click to expand...

lol. Can you deny that the US, and world, has been meddling in the middle east for centuries? I can understand the resentment.
 
Stoked said:
lol. Can you deny that the US, and world, has been meddling in the middle east for centuries? I can understand the resentment.
Click to expand...

Of course I can see the meddling the US has done, but i don't think we purposely created terrorists so that we could fight them. What looks like a conspiracy is just a series of poor decisions by people who really did have US interests at heart.

Yes we want their oil and we want it cheap. No we do not want them blowing our cities up.
 
heyhey said:
Of course I can see the meddling the US has done, but i don't think we purposely created terrorists so that we could fight them. What looks like a conspiracy is just a series of poor decisions by people who really did have US interests at heart.

Yes we want their oil and we want it cheap. No we do not want them blowing our cities up.
Click to expand...

We funded different groups against governments we did not like. When that group won or got into a position of strength they turned around and bit us. That Cobra Effect that was thrown around here a few days ago.
 
Stoked said:
We funded different groups against governments we did not like. When that group won or got into a position of strength they turned around and bit us. That Cobra Effect that was thrown around here a few days ago.
Click to expand...

Right, but we didn't fund those groups so that they would bite us in the ***(as babe suggests)we had other motives. Definition of the cobra effect am I right.
 
I wonder if this is actually an attempt by Obama to "save face."

By demanding military action, it makes it look like he actually wants intervention. However, if Congress knocks it down, he could easily just shrug is shoulders and say, "Well, at least I tried!" It helps him to save face. In reality, he doesn't want to intervene. And perhaps he knows that Congress will not give him the support he desires.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top