What's new
By:

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

  • Total voters
    29
Joe Bagadonuts said:
They are not the same. Your description of the things they are investigating in the case of the investigators is not even close to complete, either. And one of the things they are looking at is whether there really was enough evidence that a federal judge should have signed off on the spying of the Trump campaign. If the FBI under Bush had spied on the Obama campaign I don't think I would have to explain why this sort of stuff matters. I wouldn't need to anyway because Thriller would be having a conniption over it and screaming from the rafters about what a miscarriage of justice the entire fiasco was.
Click to expand...

Change my mind. I JUST, minutes ago, eyeballed the wiki's for it. No, that's not enough, so I clicked a bunch of the links at the bottom, too. Many were not from a biased source.

Help me see it your way.
 
How does this make any sense? And this guy is in charge of the executive branch?



What do the courts have to do with impeachment? He clearly doesn’t understand. Then his definition includes, “high crimes AND misdemeanors?” Oooookay. Lastly, he said that Russia wasn’t involved? That’s not what Mueller has said.

@Stoked I’m being hateful again! Better come into this thread and bash me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Mueller and his team are Some of the worst human beings on earth? Yet Putin, Kim, and Orban aren't? Interesting.

 
str8line said:
Be funny to dose him with a hit of acid just to see how he'd handle it. He would totally lose his ****.
Click to expand...

Ever hear of the Overview effect? It's something astronauts talk about, what they experience looking at Earth from space. Seems to be a transformative experience, and for the better. There's a number of world leaders could use a few orbits.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
OMG. Do I really have to spell every little thing out for you multiple times? Think back to why I made this comment. Others were making the point that Trump's complaints about being investigated were interference because if he didn't have something to hide why would he care?
Click to expand...

Literally no one is claiming that. No one thinks that Trump's tweets/speeches interfered with Mueller's investigation/count as obstruction. Do you really have no idea of what Trump actually did?
 
Wow. Does even Hannity believe this? How can you say this with a straight face?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top