What's new

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?


  • Total voters
    29
If this was the case you would have no problem showing me numerous instances where CNN missed the story to the right (I'm not currently aware of any such misses). They miss to the left very, very frequently. It's because they are heavily biased toward the left and the only people who can't see this are those who are heavily biased toward the left.

Going back to this, as an example, where CNN supports POTUS to the extent it invents an election to support POTUS's claim that Guaido was elected President of Venezuela, is that missing left or missing right?

https://news.antiwar.com/2019/05/06...elas-guaido-was-elected-president-in-january/
 
I like that you claim you dont watch Fox news but then post their stuff all the time.

Hats off to you though dude. No one gets proven wrong more on this forum but just keeps on rolling on. I mean... I would say you are trolling but you claim you are not. So I guess that means you are just sticking to your guns no matter what.

Its clear you have 3 options as a poster. 1. You are trolling. 2. You have given into propaganda because you watch garbage news like Fox news, to a lesser extent CNN, or a greater extent Breitbart or whatever the liberal version of that is. 3. You are just not that smart so you do not know how to research issues and whenever you argue something you just google what you believe and post the first link that confirms your opinion. Personally I lean towards option 3 for you.

As a fairly politically conservative person its hard to read your stuff.

Oh ****... option 4, you are a super libtard that is trying to make conservative people look bad. Hmm.... I think we have a winner.


Oooh. Let me do you now.

You are either..

A. A die hard liberal ashamed to admit he is a liberal. (Because that **** is embarrassing as hell).

B. A conservative ashamed to admit you are actually a liberal. You are not a conservative.

C. A liberal pretending to be a conservative to give conservatives a bad name.

D. A retard that doesnt understand the difference between liberal and conservative.

E. All the above. Which would make the most sense, since liberals are shape shifters.

Im going with E.

Final Answer.

Lock it in.
 
This is a great video proving the Obama administration spied on Trump. Hannity just killing it lately.

There is a nugget in there about the 7 min mark that is hilarious.

Must watch if you want some truth to what is going on with Trump, Russia, Obama spying, and the Muller report. Im not sure why its the complete opposite on this channel than it is on CNN, but it is. Its sensationalism against anti-sensationalism I guess.


Can you find one news source whose sole agenda is not fiercely peddling the right-wing agenda? For starters, news not from a pundit?

To address this smoking gun that you or they think they found: Trump had been openly courting Russia for their assistance in impacting our election, that deserves monitoring.
 
Hannity has truly been killing it lately. I especially like the part at :30 where he flip flops, admits the Times was right, and quickly cuts to some car chase to distract the worthless rubes who watch his show.

Like I said, only the most gullible


Good god.
 
Oooh. Let me do you now.

You are either..

A. A die hard liberal ashamed to admit he is a liberal. (Because that **** is embarrassing as hell).

B. A conservative ashamed to admit you are actually a liberal. You are not a conservative.

C. A liberal pretending to be a conservative to give conservatives a bad name.

D. A retard that doesnt understand the difference between liberal and conservative.

E. All the above. Which would make the most sense, since liberals are shape shifters.

Im going with E.

Final Answer.

Lock it in.

E is the closest answer of the options presented.
 
Can you find one news source whose sole agenda is not fiercely peddling the right-wing agenda? For starters, news not from a pundit?

To address this smoking gun that you or they think they found: Trump had been openly courting Russia for their assistance in impacting our election, that deserves monitoring.

There is no middle anymore. Its right or left on this subject. Either you think Trump is a Russian agent, or you think its nonsense.

I think its nonsense.

I dont care that he is openly calling for Russia to release Hillary's emails, or whatever else he has said. I believe he didnt even know the storm that was coming for saying something just off the cuff. He says a lot of things without thinking about it. Why should I believe he is involved in some grand conspiracy with Russians? The guy just says whatever comes to his mind. Its quite obvious.

Its all political games being played. Hillary is mad because she lost to a guy who just talks trash and he didn't prepare for anything. So she used her connections to get him in a lot of trouble(or so she tried) by concocting this grand scheme to make him look like he is working with Russia. She is just trying to get him back for him embarrassing her.

This is all one big show, and everyone is being played by the Clintons and all the other political snobs who are upset Trump won without putting in half the effort they all have to become as powerful as they are. They think he is a joke, and they are pissed about it.
 
There is no middle anymore. Its right or left on this subject. Either you think Trump is a Russian agent, or you think its nonsense.

I think its nonsense.

I dont care that he is openly calling for Russia to release Hillary's emails, or whatever else he has said. I believe he didnt even know the storm that was coming for saying something just off the cuff. He says a lot of things without thinking about it. Why should I believe he is involved in some grand conspiracy with Russians? The guy just says whatever comes to his mind. Its quite obvious.
How is being a blundering idiot a defense? How is that a qualification for the most powerful job on earth? Why does that seemingly appeal to you?
 
How is being a blundering idiot a defense? How is that a qualification for the most powerful job on earth?

A defense to what? I dont care if people think he's dumb. I never said he was the most qualified to be president. I would have rather seen two better candidates than what we got. Im quite sure that most Americans felt the same way.

Im just saying the Russian conspiracy is nonsense. Its obvious as hell it is. All the facts are out. All we are left is the left continuing the smear campaign to keep the negative light on him. If it isnt one thing it will be another. Id bet my life nothing happens to Trump. I said that before the Muller report even came out, while the rest were saying he was done.

How about a little credit to the people who called this BS, or at least look at the people who were spreading the BS in different light. Such as, maybe they arent as truthful and smart as they pretend to be.

Just because people keep repeating this Russian nonsense doesnt mean its ever going to be true.
 
All the facts are out.
The facts are not out. Objectively, actually, literally. They aren't. Trump is doing everything he can get away with to keep it that way. Congress doesn't even have a full copy of the Mueller Report. Did you know that? Do you know what's actually happening?

I don't think this has any great consequence. The Republicans would never allow him to be removed from office (regardless of anything he's ever demonstrably done), and the Democrats probably don't have the stones to symbolically impeach him.
 
How is being a blundering idiot a defense? How is that a qualification for the most powerful job on earth? Why does that seemingly appeal to you?
Because they have that trait in common

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I'm unaware of the definition of "miss to the left" and "miss to the right". If you define them, perhaps I can find that.
I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I mean and just don't want to answer it, but I'll be specific. CNN sometimes publishes stories that they later have to retract. Please show me examplse of stories they've had to retract because they either unjustly defamed people or institutions on the left, or stories where they have incorrectly praised people or institutions on the right. An example of a miss to the right would be the Covington High School debacle. Show me similar instances where they defamed the left.
 
I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I mean and just don't want to answer it, but I'll be specific. CNN sometimes publishes stories that they later have to retract. Please show me examplse of stories they've had to retract because they either unjustly defamed people or institutions on the left, or stories where they have incorrectly praised people or institutions on the right. An example of a miss to the right would be the Covington High School debacle. Show me similar instances where they defamed the left.

You mean, like the story they changed about how Maduro actually was the legitimate, elected President of Venezuela?

I normally don't pay attention to errors of CNN, so it may be that the only time this decade they made a mistake in that direct was this one lone article, and that it was purest coincidence it came to light just after you made this request.

Or, it could be that, regularly, I see complaints from various left-wing bloggers about CNN coverage, and this just happened to be the latest one. I'll let you decide which better fits your life view.
 
Back
Top