I agree. I also think adequate backups could be acquired if either or both were to be gone for whatever reason.
Yeah, but do those imaginary players have the trust of teh coaching staff?
I agree. I also think adequate backups could be acquired if either or both were to be gone for whatever reason.
How difficult would it be to cut bait on Ingles or Pleiss if the right deal came along?
Also, you only listed 14 players, so even by your own count we can add that wing.
I did it purposefully. Going with 15 isn't wise imo because it limits trade possibilities.
I hate agreeing with Cy, but, on the points here, I do.
We've had 15 on the roster for the past 3 years.
I wouldn't know. I think it's a definite possibility though.Yeah, but do those imaginary players have the trust of teh coaching staff?
And yet we didn't play Withey. Speights may fit the roster better. A legit 4/5 who hit 38% on 3's last year. Granted it was on just 62 attempts but still.
And yet we didn't play Withey. Speights may fit the roster better. A legit 4/5 who hit 38% on 3's last year. Granted it was on just 62 attempts but still.
What's so legit about Speights?
I wouldn't know. I think it's a definite possibility though.
I think the coaching staff has more trust in George hill and exum than mack or neto though.
Mack and neto are third (and fourth) stringers.
He played minutes for a NBA title team and is big, can play d, and stretch the floor. That's something we don't have right now as Lyles will get destroyed on defense by pretty much every NBA 5.