So far, in the US, there have been 2, and neither were fatal.
Where politically-directed falsification of reports is the issue, as it is in the US, you should not just believe what you're told. Fortunately, our "news" is not prevailing worldwide. There are valid reports being done, even if they are suppressed in the US.
Here is something that should wake you up. It is done with a high level of integrity and intellect, and is well-documented and relies on mainstream sources of reporting as a mid-level summary work published in a respected peer-reviewed journal.
" However, despite these positive data regarding the efficacy of vaccines, more severe Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) such as anaphylaxis, Bell's Palsy, Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) and deaths have been reported in persons who have already received one or two doses of the vaccines [, , "
- 9. Mortality after COVID-19 vaccination: More concerningly have been emerging reports of deaths following the various available COVID-19 vaccines. A Norwegian expert group has noted mortality in frail patients vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and advocate a risk-benefit analysis in this cohort of patients . There have been multiple other reasons attributed to deaths with these vaccines including fatal anaphylaxis and a paradoxical syndrome of blood clots and thrombocytopenia (VITT) [14,15]. VITT has been predominantly noticed following the first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and this has led to change in vaccine strategy with the CDC panel including various national governments advocating avoiding Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in specific age groups and women .
Post vaccination deaths due to COVID-19 have been reported in older individuals with multiple co-morbidities . It has been reported that vaccine effectiveness is generally lower in such groups .
- 10. Role of Genealogy: It has been certainly clear that Black and Ethnic Minority (BAME) population have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 . What is still being evaluated is the effect of COVID-19 vaccine and its relationship with genetic configuration.
The studies elucidating these mechanisms for COVID-19 infection and mortality after commonly used COVID-19 vaccinations are summarized in Table 1 . The studies where the incidence of breakthrough infection post vaccination has been evaluated across various countries is summarized in Table 2 ."
This report is on the inside track with accepted professionals even the US NIH and CDC.
But in reading it, I see a deliberate bias misdirecting attention from what I suspect are the main valid modes of vaccine-caused mortalities. It should be viewed as an Establishment attempt to defend the vaccines against what are the most prevalent outsider allegations.
Against what I mentioned a few posts above about concerns such as blood-clotting issues. I began raising this issue as soon as I knew what the vaccines were. There is simply no way you are going to manipulate the immune system with mRNA methods involving "tricking" the immune system with disease antibodies produced in this manner. A pretty slick trick, I do say. Nice that the mRNA is short-lived and therefore adverse reactions might trend on the short-term side as well. But our immune system is beyond our comprehension, really, and capable of destroying any self cell that somehow "looks" wrong. Read that as "Autoimmune Disease".
Anomalous blood clotting or otherwise notable effects on blood cell functions are to be expected in any kind of scenario where damage is occurring to any cell population accessible to the blood stream caused by any artificial agent of our contrivance.
I doubt you would even care to read this report. No need. You are handed daily talking points and supporting references, I believe. And that is your universe and your pathetic life. As I've stated elsewhere, you are not a scientist in this field of study. Some would say neither am I. I was once, and occasionally dip back in. What I recall most fondly is the kind of seminars that collegiate departments used to hold, where you had to go in armed to the teeth to support any assertion in your report because for damn certain you would be challenged from every possible angle.
Now, I imagine, such colloquia are cake-walks for the woke who support the desired political drift. Maybe I oughtta go back and see, but judging from what I see coming out in print, it would likely be another useless exercise in trying to deflect an agenda.
It is, nevertheless, very necessary to do reports like this as a stonewall against wild allegations from a ignoramus public in general. The fact that official attention, concern and effort is being made with these issues is far better than nothing at all.
And again, there is here no sign of the alleged "worldwide" genocide" unless you are resigned, as a sort of putative genocide engineer, to a very disperse, ineffective, sort of "genocide" that will reduce the target population by, at best,1% mostly old people with only a few years of expected life. Might help some countries with severe problems with too few young working people to pay the cost of excess elderly folks. But hey, that's what ordinary colds and flu are for already.