What's new
By:

Would you trade the 12th pick for.......

Hotdog

Hotdog

Well-Known Member
Mason Plumlee


He put up great numbers when he started. Not sure why he was buried on the bench. He's athletic and plays with energy. Brooklyn might do it. Would you do it?

He still on a nice rookie deal.
 
Depends who is still on the board at 12. He kind of is a poor man's Derrick Favors and the Jazz already have Favors, so he might be redundant.
 
I think Brooklyn fans would crap themselves in excitement if Utah offered this. A lot of Brooklyn fans don't like Mason that much. He's already 25 years old and hasn't really improved his range or anything since he got into the league.
 
zyzz said:
I think Brooklyn fans would crap themselves in excitement if Utah offered this. A lot of Brooklyn fans don't like Mason that much. He's already 25 years old and hasn't really improved his range or anything since he got into the league.
Click to expand...

I don't know if being 25 in this situation is a bad thing. We need help right now, and he's real cheap on that rookie deal. Drafting another 19 year old big could take forever to develop and help us.

I'm not saying it's the greatest deal, but for a backup big??

Maybe we could extract something else from them too if it's such a good deal for them
 
Last edited:
Hack said:
Mason Plumlee


He put up great numbers when he started. Not sure why he was buried on the bench. He's athletic and plays with energy. Brooklyn might do it. Would you do it?

He still on a nice rookie deal.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't hate it, but I would rather have the pick.
 
White Chocolate said:
Would you guys trade #12 for George Hill?

I don't know if I would yet, just throwing it out there.
Click to expand...

The curse of George Hill dictates that whoever gets drafted with that pick will go on to become the next Kawhi Leonard.

No thanks to Plumlee or Hill or Batum or Sessions or Vonleh (although I admit that one would tempt me.) They can probably get a better player just by staying at 12 and waiting until the deadline to make any moves.
 
Is Mason Plumlee better than Kaminsky?

With Tomic a possibility, I think the Jazz MIGHT look to fill a different need. Dekker seems like a good fit to me. He could play either forward spot depending on matchups. That's good versatility to have. I could also see the Jazz trading back or even out if they got a future first. From Perrin's interviews, it doesn't sound like he - at least - thinks much of the players that will be available. He sees depth all the way back through the first round, but no all-stars.
 
Stifle Tower said:
Is Mason Plumlee better than Kaminsky?

With Tomic a possibility, I think the Jazz MIGHT look to fill a different need. Dekker seems like a good fit to me. He could play either forward spot depending on matchups. That's good versatility to have. I could also see the Jazz trading back or even out if they got a future first. From Perrin's interviews, it doesn't sound like he - at least - thinks much of the players that will be available. He sees depth all the way back through the first round, but no all-stars.
Click to expand...

Kaminsky may be better. I'm not sure. But I think Mason Plumlee might be more of a sure thing.

I'm not saying it's great, but I'm pretty sure Plumlee would be a nice addition off the bench.

The draft is such a crap shoot. Who knows what we are going to get.
 
Hack said:
Kaminsky may be better. I'm not sure. But I think Mason Plumlee might be more of a sure thing.

I'm not saying it's great, but I'm pretty sure Plumlee would be a nice addition off the bench.

The draft is such a crap shoot. Who knows what we are going to get.
Click to expand...

True. Maybe the Jazz make their pick and then trade the rights to that player later, once the situation with Tomic is resolved one way or the other,
 
An A+ for surprise... Did not see that one coming. An F for the trade... Just no sorry.
 
Why no love for Plumlee?

Have any of you watched him play or looked at the numbers he can put up? He's no slouch. He's a big athletic guy that can rebound very well and score.

What's the problem? We aren't looking for another starting big.
 
Hack said:
Why no love for Plumlee?

Have any of you watched him play or looked at the numbers he can put up? He's no slouch. He's a big athletic guy that can rebound very well and score.

What's the problem? We aren't looking for another starting big.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't mind it, atleast we know what were getting. Someone who consistently puts up 8 and 6 off the bench and is fun to watch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top