What's new

Yesterday - Bundy Ranch

That's a helluva recommendation coming from you. for real, as in srs.

Might be fun to see if I can swim in the same tank. . . .

OTOH, can I just count on him being inured to gallery jeers?

Truth is, to be a really good lawyer, you have to be like Tink.

You should have seen the people threatening to sue me quickly back peddle once Tink got involved. Mind you, this wasn't some loner dude who works at 7-11 who was coming after me, but a high ranking elected official. I <3 me some Tink, and he's earned his right to be an overbearing know-it-all. Franklin is the only other person that gets this kind of pass with me.
 
Posting any evidence whatsoever would be helpful.

I have no idea where you got anything that you posted above or who told you things or what basis you have for preferring that narrative over any other.

Documents are best, but probably not findable or postable. This has been the primary reason I keep going back to court filings for the historical claims and figuring out what the parties positions are. I can access them, they are extensive and include primary documents as exhibits in many cases, and verified pleadings are under oath so they tend to have fewer embellishments.

I assume that if you're already trying to substantiate this version of events then you're looking for documents, contemporaneous reports, or any other kind of evidence. Obviously it's hard to evaluate just a lengthy theory of what is "actually" happening.

Good answer. Yes, I am doing just that.. and have done most of it but just looking for even more substance. I have a very prominent attorney helping me in the process. I put out the outline. I'll respect that you can't believe just because I typed it.. and hopefully you can respect why I may not want to post every detail.
I'm sure I've already said too much, rather than too little.

My apologies if I'm come off a dick. I'm really not.
 
I'd be interested, tink, in you doing a quick search of these environmentalist groups (I don't need more substance, btw).

Maybe check out Sierra Club / Center for Biological Diversity.
Check out their M.O.

It sickens me, tbh.
 
You should have seen the people threatening to sue me quickly back peddle once Tink got involved. Mind you, this wasn't some loner dude who works at 7-11 who was coming after me, but a high ranking elected official.

Well that wasn't even a real job. That was just for funsies so I could tell my mom a funny story.
 
Why would he disclose that personal info to you?

Personal info? I would assume the dude is an officer of the court and would have no issues saying what kind of law he practices. He can PM me if he feels threatened? Are you representing him here on the boards?
 
Last edited:
Well that wasn't even a real job. That was just for funsies so I could tell my mom a funny story.
Which makes it all the more impressive.

Fun little side story to that; that same buffoon has decided that we're pals somehow and he keeps posting on my Facebook As if nothing ever happened.
 
albundy4tds.jpg
 
Vegas already has a pipeline from the colorado at lake mead. They are one of the lower colorado river states. The upper states are required to release 7.5 million acre feet of water just below Lake Powell. Of the lower colorado states California has always been in the drivers seat. Nevada may only pull 300,000 acre feet plus they are credited for any treated water they release back into the colorado so they pull almost 600,000 acre feet. They cannot get any more from the colorado.

If my memory serves me correctly our Governor already tried to block the Snake valley pipeline and was only able to acquire minor concessions from the snwa. Good luck but if Herbert wasn't successful I can't imagine how you are going to win this fight. If the ranchers in southern Navada want to keep their lifestyle they would have to be successful blocking further development. Honestly the best they can probably hope for is favorable terms for a 100 year lease of their water.
 
Back
Top