Thoughts on my big board process.
My 1-8 is pretty rock solid. The order might be different day to day, but I feel pretty strongly about the top 8 being a clear level above the next grouping. I could probably make a divide in that 2-8 grouping to further categorize players, but they all feel pretty close. If I had a big board based on safety of outcome, Miller/Scoot would be in their own tier above all non-Victor players, but that's not really how I view this board.
Tier B is just the 4 PGs who I all really like and think they are all pretty close.
Tier C. Generally all interchangeable day to day how I'm feeling. Threw in NSJ at the end. Even though I don't like him, he had major injury issues and he is well regarded, so I think he deserves to make it at the very end of the tier list. I did like the way he looked on the court (like general confidence level just popped to me) when he played.
Tier D is just my back end of the first who I think are a slight step above the guys not listed at all. If I did a further list, there are probably 10 more prospects I'm really intrigued by then it drops off.