What's new

You're the GM this offseason. What do you do?

The one thing I learned/took away from the Jazz' playoff run this year is that the on/off or +/- numbers with lineups mean jack **** come playoff time and it's all about matchups, as the Jazz are too well coached and have enough talent to get by in the regular season regardless. Jazz had zero matchup advantages against Houston in the starting lineup (outside of maybe the Favors/Capela matchup when Gobert got benched) and got thoroughly outplayed for the most part. Same is true against the Warriors, and other teams like Portland have more favourable matchups against us too.

Don't really care what the numbers in the regular season say, if we're running Mitchell at point it's gotta be because we think it'll give us a matchup advantage come playoff time (note - I think it can assuming Mitchell improves over the offseason, not trying to say it can't). But it's why even though a guy like Favors is a better player than a guy like Exum, I'd be more inclined to keep Exum over Favors when talking about bringing in someone like Tobias or even a PG like Kemba/maybe DLo if the Kyrie rumours are to be believed or trade for Conley because the potential matchup advantages Exum has as a versatile combo guard who can guard the opposing teams best player vs Favors who is borderline unplayable against the elite teams in the West unless he gets to play C (which means benching our reigning DPOTY) matters, even though Favors is the better player and is far more reliable and productive than broken down Exum has been the last few years.

We just can't start a guy who gives the Jazz instant matchup problems against any of the real contenders in the West and we can't pay him $17 mil to be a backup to one of our max cornerstones either imo. Favors will absolutely stuff the stat sheet for like 20 - 25 NBA teams currently if he got to play C but the Jazz isn't one of them because we have an all star level/DPOTY level center. If the roster was already contending level then you can think about it but considering the Jazz have glaring holes at PG and PF, paying $17 mil to Favs just doesn't make sense to me and DL missed the boat to trade him.
 
Okay, I'm the GM this off season. Well, if I take a handful of posters advice (@Lakers_Slapper I'm looking at you) I think it would go a little something like this

anigif_sub-buzz-9744-1557877720-1.gif

I'm so confused.
 
OOOHHH, I thought you were emptying a colostomy bag of fire in a field.
It’s gonna be hilarious when Jazz fans realize no young African American with options is going to move to Utah.

If we can trade for Lowry or Conley, you do it IMO.

Why would that be hilarious? And why do you think that's true? We've had plenty of "African American" players sign with us before over the last 30 years. Why is it now different? That was a very strange statement.
 
I tend to agree about mgt being conservative. Can't upset the business model.
Is our business model to get blown out of the playoffs every year? Is our business model to lose our talented drafted players to free agency in exchange for nothing? Is our business model to remain a team that has ZERO championships? Oh yea, we better not disrupt that! Thank's for your 2 cents!
 
I would definitely take a chance on Josh Jackson. Maybe TJ Warren too. During the draft, I would trade Korver and #23 for Jackson and #32. It's worth the gamble. I know Igor was the coach last year but that roster and franchise is a mess. I think with better support around Jackson, and a better leader than Booker, maybe he could reach is potential which is still really high.

Financially, this isn't that bad for us:

Korver is $7.5 if kept and $3.44 if waived. #23 has a salary of $1.89. So waived Korver plus #23 is still $5.4 million vs Jackson's 2019-20 salary of $7 million. Picking up Jackson really doesn't sacrifice any big time summer targets.

We could select somebody with #32 or maybe even trade it for a very late 1st rounder in a future draft or for multiple future 2nd rounders or select a player we might have liked at #23 (Carsen Edwards, Admiral Schofield, etc.).

Josh Jackson was arrested on the 13th for something stupid. I don't think we need him.
 
I don’t think the FO has any interest in him. I mean, interest like, hey, we’ll take him for a second rounder, but not interest in the sense of “we think this guy helps us.” They’ve already staked their opinion on him (twice) — that he’s not worth a first round pick. And if you don’t value someone enough to think they’re worth a first round pick, I don’t think you really value them at all, other than, best case scenario, seeing them as a decent accessory.

I like Mirotic, but I would hate to see what we would give up for him. There's no way we could negotiate trading for him and just give up a second round pick, when we couldn't negotiate anything better that giving up 27 year old Burks AND two second round picks for 37 year old Korver. I know yall on this site are sick of me bringing this trade up. But I want everyone to remember the capabilities and our inabilities are at the front office. I'm worried for any of our valuable draft picks that are in trade consideration because our FO doesn't value them.
 
Brogdon is great and would be a great fit on the Jazz but I just don't see the Bucks letting him go. I don't think it's worth it to tie up our cap space for 3 days just to have the Bucks match, meanwhile all the other free agents are signing elsewhere while we wait.

I'm lost. So you don't think the Bucks will give up Brogdon so why should the Jazz even try? But all the other free agents are signing elsewhere during that three days? So lets only offer bottom of the barrel guys contracts? I think all the other free agents are signing elsewhere because teams try and make offers. I would bet that you will definitely fail at signing any player in the league if you never show interest. Wouldn't you?
 
I'm lost. So you don't think the Bucks will give up Brogdon so why should the Jazz even try? But all the other free agents are signing elsewhere during that three days? So lets only offer bottom of the barrel guys contracts? I think all the other free agents are signing elsewhere because teams try and make offers. I would bet that you will definitely fail at signing any player in the league if you never show interest. Wouldn't you?
You're right but Jingled is also right in saying that there's no real point in having the Bucks tie up your cap space for 3 days when it's about 99% confirmed he's staying with the Bucks considered he's an RFA. You can express interest in a number of other ways without necessarily tying up your cap space and putting yourself out of the free agency picture for 72 hours. You want to be aggressive with offers to UFAs not RFAs.
 
I like Mirotic, but I would hate to see what we would give up for him. There's no way we could negotiate trading for him and just give up a second round pick, when we couldn't negotiate anything better that giving up 27 year old Burks AND two second round picks for 37 year old Korver. I know yall on this site are sick of me bringing this trade up. But I want everyone to remember the capabilities and our inabilities are at the front office. I'm worried for any of our valuable draft picks that are in trade consideration because our FO doesn't value them.

Mirotic is a free agent iirc. Dont have to give anything up in a trade.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top