What's new
By:

Am I racist?

fishonjazz said:
I didn't get your answer from your discussion with siro though. Maybe you expect to much from me.
I'm not particularly smart and don't catch everything in a convo especially if it's not obvious or direct or the vocabulary goes over my.

In the future I would suggest that when dealing with a question from me specifically to either answer it or don't answer rather than tell me to look through a thread for it.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. And cut that "i'm not particularly smart" nonsense out of here. Anyone and everyone is intelligent-- we are intelligent beings. Some try to harness this gift of intelligence more than others. Intelligence is so multifactorial, and so dynamic-- that it's impossible to objectively call one person 'smarter' than another. The measure of how you assess that is inherently biased to what you consider the measure of intelligence to be. (tl;dr ur smart)
 
LazyD said:
Nah, bro. Blacks being good at dancing is from the long history of shaking their bodies to the beat of the tribal drum.
Click to expand...

Nm
I have been an a hole enough for one night.
 
LazyD said:
Nah, bro. Blacks being good at dancing is from the long history of shaking their bodies to the beat of the tribal drum.
Click to expand...

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to LazyD again.

10/10 troll.
 
dalamon said:
Fair enough. And cut that "i'm not particularly smart" nonsense out of here. Anyone and everyone is intelligent-- we are intelligent beings. Some try to harness this gift of intelligence more than others. Intelligence is so multifactorial, and so dynamic-- that it's impossible to objectively call one person 'smarter' than another. The measure of how you assess that is inherently biased to what you consider the measure of intelligence to be. (tl;dr ur smart)
Click to expand...
You are seriously way out of my league though bro
 
fishonjazz said:
You are seriously way out of my league though bro
Click to expand...

when it comes to talking about biological terms? Maybe. Sociocultural discussions? Maybe. But these are like 2 of 90340937434 ways we can assess intelligence.

Let's talk about how to raise a dog, how to communicate with a dog. How to train a dog, how to reason with a dog. I don't know **** about dogs-- you'd whoop my *** in every measure in this realm, intellectually-speaking. Relationship-knowledge? You know more. THere's many other categories where you probably know more. Does that make you smarter than me? Well, ya! Same goes for fights-- Floyd Mayweather has a PhD in it, whereas I don't know ****.

Intelligence isn't monolithic.
 
dalamon said:
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to LazyD again.

10/10 troll.
Click to expand...

It is the reason, though, right? I mean, it is the reason the stereotype exists. It is related to their supposed sense of rhythm. It stems from derogatory reference to their tribalism.
 
Siro said:
It is the reason, though, right? I mean, it is the reason the stereotype exists. It is related to their supposed sense of rhythm. It stems from derogatory reference to their tribalism.
Click to expand...

I think the whole dancing stereotype has been irreversibly meshed with black hyperexuality. And that stems from something else. So it's a bit convoluted IMO.
 
dalamon said:
when it comes to talking about biological terms? Maybe. Sociocultural discussions? Maybe. But these are like 2 of 90340937434 ways we can assess intelligence.

Let's talk about how to raise a dog, how to communicate with a dog. How to train a dog, how to reason with a dog. I don't know **** about dogs-- you'd whoop my *** in every measure in this realm, intellectually-speaking. Does that make you smarter than me? Well, ya! Same goes for fights-- Floyd Mayweather has a PhD in it, whereas I don't know ****.

Intelligence isn't monolithic.
Click to expand...

I consider intelligence as more monolololithic than you believe it to be. A lot of what you discuss above I'd probably call knowledge. Personally, I characterize the rate at which someone can obtain and retain knowledge to be a more accurate assessment of their intelligence.
 
not sure if dis is real or troll topic tbh.
how did OP know what race these people were anyway? and 'mexican' isn't even a race, it's a nationality.
 
LazyD said:
I consider intelligence as more monolololithic than you believe it to be. A lot of what you discuss above I'd probably call knowledge. Personally, I characterize the rate at which someone can obtain and retain knowledge to be a more accurate assessment of their intelligence.
Click to expand...

So rate > possession of knowledge in your eyes? Is possession of knowledge not intelligence in any way-- in your opinion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top