What's new
By:

Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Organs

Cappy_Smurf said:
It's pretty ****ing sad that you and your kind can't even imagine how some naive, passive teenage girl might find herself in a situation where something happens with an overzealous teenage boy with a hair trigger. Too busy judging your fellow humans to consider that not everything is as simple as black and white.
Click to expand...

well thats the job of parentS to give their child a good upbringing.
 
Jaymz said:
Agreed. Not everyone is born in a beneficial situation, with the same opportunities. Same parenting, morals etc.
Click to expand...

thats why we should not dilute and devalue marriage by letting goivernment endorse **** get married. its all connected bro.

we as a society send a message as what is acceptable by government.

**** should be free to do whatever. but when government is endorsing it like that morals family values and sex get devalued

images


the governments celebrate **** matrimony. so yeah family values get devalued.
 
Cappy_Smurf said:
It's pretty ****ing sad that you and your kind can't even imagine how some naive, passive teenage girl might find herself in a situation where something happens with an overzealous teenage boy with a hair trigger. Too busy judging your fellow humans to consider that not everything is as simple as black and white.
Click to expand...

There isn't anyone like me.

I can imagine how a lot of stupid people do stupid things, but I don't care to assign uninformed innocence and exonerate stupidity. "Easy" girls might be lots of fun on the red hill or black ridge backroads in the back seat of your chevy or even in your van, but still "an overzealous teenage boy with a hair trigger" isn't all that ready to take her home to Mama for Sunday dinner, either. So, it happens to "naïve, passive" girls and girls who don't think things through all the time, no matter whether naïve or not. That's why, if kids had responsible parents and none of the "morals" pedaled by public schools, and "hairtrigger" teen boys had to consider the implications of a shotgun wedding, society would have less of these events.

Obviously, you're an intolerant person yourself with your hairtrigger negs.

black and white is never very simple. It takes good sense to admit there's a right or better way. It takes stuff like integrity, good judgment, and an actual good education to see the difference. People who refuse to see the difference aren't simple either. The whole syndrome of dishonest and irresponsible denial of the obvious truth arises, generally, from confused rationalization. A lot of hard work goes into being that stupid or that dishonest, or that irresponsible, or that immature, or that "sophisticated", as some wish to call it.
 
DutchJazzer said:
thats why we should not dilute and devalue marriage by letting goivernment endorse **** get married. its all connected bro.

we as a society send a message as what is acceptable by government.

**** should be free to do whatever. but when government is endorsing it like that morals family values and sex get devalued

images


the governments celebrate **** matrimony. so yeah family values get devalued.
Click to expand...

I can't tell what's filtered here. None of my regular profanity fits in well.
 
I didn't have the perfect childhood. One could say I was in a toxic environment until I moved out at 17. I, however looked at people who chose to good things and be good people and chose them as role models. I chose to model myself after the intention of being good, because it brought good emotions. You can't tell me you feel terrific after punching, screaming, or hurting someone. I didn't take the bad examples and the abuse (Physically and emotionally) forward. I guess it does depend on the person, though. Chemical disorders and disabilities etc.

No matter your situation, you can choose to change it. Just because you were born in poverty doesn't mean it has to last the rest of your life. Everyone has their path through life, some people need the structure of religion to guide them, some people need heroes, some people just need to believe in themselves. In the end you have to live with your choices.

I guess that's why I would choose to live and let live. I always have empathy though, as I could have easily been born into someone else situation.
 
Jaymz said:
I didn't have the perfect childhood. One could say I was in a toxic environment until I moved out at 17. I, however looked at people who chose to good things and be good people and chose them as role models. I chose to model myself after the intention of being good, because it brought good emotions. You can't tell me you feel terrific after punching, screaming, or hurting someone. I didn't take the bad examples and the abuse (Physically and emotionally) forward. I guess it does depend on the person, though. Chemical disorders and disabilities etc.

No matter your situation, you can choose to change it. Just because you were born in poverty doesn't mean it has to last the rest of your life. Everyone has their path through life, some people need the structure of religion to guide them, some people need heroes, some people just need to believe in themselves. In the end you have to live with your choices.

I guess that's why I would choose to live and let live. I always have empathy though, as I could have easily been born into someone else situation.
Click to expand...

good way to "go forward" with life.

philosophically, I can see where there are legitimate questions about what is "good" and what isn't. practically speaking, results are a clue.
 
babe said:
There isn't anyone like me.

I can imagine how a lot of stupid people do stupid things, but I don't care to assign uninformed innocence and exonerate stupidity. "Easy" girls might be lots of fun on the red hill or black ridge backroads in the back seat of your chevy or even in your van, but still "an overzealous teenage boy with a hair trigger" isn't all that ready to take her home to Mama for Sunday dinner, either. So, it happens to "naïve, passive" girls and girls who don't think things through all the time, no matter whether naïve or not. That's why, if kids had responsible parents and none of the "morals" pedaled by public schools, and "hairtrigger" teen boys had to consider the implications of a shotgun wedding, society would have less of these events.

Obviously, you're an intolerant person yourself with your hairtrigger negs.

black and white is never very simple. It takes good sense to admit there's a right or better way. It takes stuff like integrity, good judgment, and an actual good education to see the difference. People who refuse to see the difference aren't simple either. The whole syndrome of dishonest and irresponsible denial of the obvious truth arises, generally, from confused rationalization. A lot of hard work goes into being that stupid or that dishonest, or that irresponsible, or that immature, or that "sophisticated", as some wish to call it.
Click to expand...

No.
 
OK, lemme get this straight.

So a young woman who gets pregnant unintentionally is not fit to bring home to your Momma - but she is fit to marry and raise your child?

Hmmm, interesting.
 
moevillini said:
OK, lemme get this straight.

So a young woman who gets pregnant unintentionally is not fit to bring home to your Momma - but she is fit to marry and raise your child?

Hmmm, interesting.
Click to expand...
.

Nevertheless, in the old America I am drawing a pic of, that young woman could expect her parents to go to the young man's parents, and righteously arrange for a marriage and lifetime support for her and her children.

The boy is the responsible doofus, and everyone would expect him to man up,
 
moevillini said:
OK, lemme get this straight.

So a young woman who gets pregnant unintentionally is not fit to bring home to your Momma - but she is fit to marry and raise your child?

Hmmm, interesting.
Click to expand...

well i lived by a simple rule since i was a teen. if you dont want to get a girl pregnant don't have sex with her.
if you for whatever reason/accident impregnate her, you better man the **** up and take care of your woman and child till I DIE. and after i die and they need help my family would take care of them like they are their own. it is a simple thing.
if everybody lived like that black America wouldn't have a 70% single mother rate. or overall rate from 35%.

excesive single parent homes is a disease to society.


so to answer your qquestion i would nver have sex with a woman i deem unfit to marry or raise a child
 
DutchJazzer said:
nah i meant should he have been aborted cus of his condition.
is it ok to abort handicaps. wouldnt humanity miss out on the next stephen hawking then
Click to expand...
But I was taking about things that happen pre birth. Rape, drug addicted mom, teen pregnancy, pregnant women that know they don't want their baby, etc

Hawking is already out of the womb right now.
 
fishonjazz said:
But I was taking about things that happen pre birth. Rape, drug addicted mom, teen pregnancy, pregnant women that know they don't want their baby, etc

Hawking is already out of the womb right now.
Click to expand...

for the millionth time i am not oposed to abortion.
i am opposed to "recreational" abortion.
meaning u have recreational sex and are just retarded and stoopid doesnt mean u should have abortion.

rape abortion aslo allowed!

the other **** em!

teen pregnancy? why shouldn't the parents of the teen be RESPONSIBLE for their children's action? and not MURDER their grandchild but as 2 families be partly responsible for the grand-kid and their kid.

drugaddiction **** THEM? i would say cut out their wombs and balls. but that is considered not human but straight up murder is humane? ok how about this lace drugs with preconception pills. we got scientist who could figure out stemcell cure ebola. we can certainly find a way to lace drugs with contraception.
but because they are drug addicts they should be free from responsibilty? if someone is coked up on cocaine and heroine and gets behind the wheel and kills your kid would you go: "ooh wait your drugged up, aah then dont worry your free go away dont worry about the consequences" nah you will cry for a judge to hang him.
drugaddiction does not absolve you from responsibilities and consequences.

and whats left
pregnant women that know they don't want their baby? wtf why the **** did they have sex?
 
DutchJazzer said:
for the millionth time i am not oposed to abortion.
i am opposed to "recreational" abortion.
meaning u have recreational sex and are just retarded and stoopid doesnt mean u should have abortion.

rape abortion aslo allowed!

the other **** em!

teen pregnancy? why shouldn't the parents of the teen be RESPONSIBLE for their children's action? and not MURDER their grandchild but as 2 families be partly responsible for the grand-kid and their kid.

drugaddiction **** THEM? i would say cut out their wombs and balls. but that is considered not human but straight up murder is humane? ok how about this lace drugs with preconception pills. we got scientist who could figure out stemcell cure ebola. we can certainly find a way to lace drugs with contraception.
but because they are drug addicts they should be free from responsibilty? if someone is coked up on cocaine and heroine and gets behind the wheel and kills your kid would you go: "ooh wait your drugged up, aah then dont worry your free go away dont worry about the consequences" nah you will cry for a judge to hang him.
drugaddiction does not absolve you from responsibilities and consequences.

and whats left
pregnant women that know they don't want their baby? wtf why the **** did they have sex?
Click to expand...
Why bring up Stephen hawking doe
 
fishonjazz said:
Why bring up Stephen hawking doe
Click to expand...

some people brought up if a kid is handicap. and there is a way to know see that. would u allow abortion.
now there must be "sciency way" to see if people will get ALS since i heard is a genetic disease.

so lets say back in the day stephen hawkings mom decide to abort because some science said the fetus gets ALS. then gets aborted, the world misses out on a stephen hawking.
not only that but ask responsible family oriented parenst what they think of their handicapped offspring all will love their kids.
so should certain diseases a fetus might suffer from birth or later in live be cause for abortion?
i think it should not be. but again if some people get abortion dont let the government/tax payers pay for it
 
Hmm no discussion that PP has been absolved of any wrong doing? Thought some of you who were absolutely positive PP has broken laws would question or debate the findings of the investigation.

I guess the argument is over, PP has broken no laws and can go on doing the good work they do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top