Damn, you have feeling they will like or hate the deal next year? Pretty hot take: The Jazz will have an opinion on Joe Johnson a year from now.
Joe Johnson Coming to Utah
- Thread starter mdalby
- Start date
Damn, you have feeling they will like or hate the deal next year? Pretty hot take: The Jazz will have an opinion on Joe Johnson a year from now.
Diehard Casual
Active Member
I have the same question. I found this old article out of Brooklyn from summer 2012. https://thebrooklyngame.com/joe-johnson-defense/
It's a little generous and we can expect him to have lost a step or two in the 4 years since this analysis was written. Regardless, I found it to be an interesting read.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Read the post again. I said I didn't like it or hate it but that they would hate it the second year. Never said either or.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hedda Gambler
Well-Known Member
I don`t get that you all keep including Withey in your depth charts. Most likely, one of Favors or Gobert will be on the floor as C at all times. Lyles will get a lot of minutes and both Hayward and Johnson can play a bit at the 4. And, with the contenders spending an obscene amount of money, shouldn`t a rim protecting 5 like Withey who actually can protect the rim, be worth a bit in a trade on his bargain contract?
Because teams don't go to a 3 big rotation that early in the season. Yes we might do some Hayward or Johnson at the 4, but there will also be games where we want to go big.
Favors and Gobert are both big dudes, they can't handle a full season of playing 35+ minutes every night.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
cctrackstar
Well-Known Member
Just the other day I was listening to a Jazz exec (might have been lindsey) talking about free agency, and mentioned that a player they had just made a courtesy call to was actually not just interested, but very interested in coming here. Locke in his podcast confirmed that it was indeed Joe Johnson.
Here's the link again if you missed it earlier.
https://audioboom.com/boos/4774125-locked-on-jazz-immediate-reaction-jazz-sign-joe-johnson?utm_campaign=detailpage&utm_content=retweet&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
So nice to have someone even a (former) nba star want to come here.
Here's the link again if you missed it earlier.
https://audioboom.com/boos/4774125-locked-on-jazz-immediate-reaction-jazz-sign-joe-johnson?utm_campaign=detailpage&utm_content=retweet&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
So nice to have someone even a (former) nba star want to come here.
Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Don't you think after last year that Utah might want some injury insurance for Favors and Rudy?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
It's cool how different each of our wing players are, and how much they can learn off each other.
We got Hayward as Lebron-lite, Burks as our slashing athletic driver, Hood being the pure scorer, and JJ being one of the best post-up wings of the last few years in the NBA. Hayward NEEDS to learn as much from Joe as possible. Will have massive payoffs for his game.
The wing rotation of Hood/Hayward/Burks/JoeJ might be the NBA's deepest
Hedda Gambler
Well-Known Member
Sure, and I suspect that Pleiss will get some minutes. Or, how about we trade Burke and Withey to the Cavs for Frye to pick up the only kind of player we only need, a stretch 4/5? The Cavs would save a ****load of tax by replacing Delly, Mozgov and Frye with Burke and Withey. Jeff could also really help them defensively while Jefferson would provide 3 pt shooting off the bench.
Diehard Casual
Active Member
Not to mention that G Hill is a viable option for minutes at the 2. If guys are having an off night on the perimeter there is plenty of help to rotate through until we can find someone with some juice. I'm very pleased with this deal.
From different podcasts I've listened to with various players the word around the league is that Quin is pretty good. Also people seem to like how our organization has grown this team.
I remember quite a few teams coveting Johnson when his contract was bought out by the Nets? Cleveland was one of those teams too, I believe.
So to have him picked us over those legit teams is to me quite surprising...
Diehard Casual
Active Member
For the money in the deal he accepted it has to be the role he was offered. I hope that he wasn't promised a starting spot. I'm thinking maybe at this point in his career, with all the criticism he's earned and absorbed, he perhaps wants to accept a role with less pressure. He can be an important contributor, mentor, and veteran presence with our team. We're either going to love him or "meh" him. It's a short cheap deal so buyer's remorse can't be that bad. We have 20mil available if we still want to sign another FA this summer or absorb salary through trade so the opportunity cost isn't even that high.
Hedda Gambler
Well-Known Member
Deron wasn`t on the team, IIRC. Didn`t we actually play the Nets with Deron the next day? I remember watching the game and cheering every time the Hawks gave the ball to Josh Smith and biting nails when Joe got it.
Idk, I guess he will address that in his press conference.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Not just that, but the fact we signed him so early and at a reasonable amount. For once, we aren't the team someone settled for when they couldn't go where they really wanted.
Makes me wonder if Utah didn't promise him playing time he couldn't get elsewhere. The combination of playing time and for a team that looks ready to make a jump makes some sense.