Good post. I had thought haywards point per game would go down but you make a good case for that not happening.I don't see Hayward taking a near 2 point step back in production after steadily raising scoring each year.
New guys won't be taking away any shots from Hayward. They are taking shots from Ingles/Neto/Booker/Johnson/Mack. If anything they may create more shots for Hayward.
I do think you are correct in predicting a minutes decrease for Hayward. I predict about 34 mpg from the 36 he was at last year
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Bold indeed
I would be shocked if you were right about this one.Boris Diaw averages more minutes than Lyles pre all-star break, but Lyles overtakes him after.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
New guys won't be taking away any shots from Hayward. They are taking shots from Ingles/Neto/Booker/Johnson/Mack.[/URL]
Mack took more shots per minute with the Jazz last year than Hill did with the Pacers.Nope
Hill and Johnson's usage will be higher than Ingles/ Neto/ Johnson/ Mack's
Lyle's usage will be higher than Booker's
Usage is zero sum, Hayward's will fall from 25.7 to 23.5-24.5. His minutes will drop from 36.2 to 34-35. His efficiency will go up. His assists will go up. He'll score 18-20.
Might be a little of both, IMO. Spurs have had seasons when no one averaged >30 mins. I could see Derrick and Gordon getting mins chopped, especially if subs are maintaining leads deep into the 4th (and Quin mentioned that in his interview).The idea that we brought these guys in to take away shots from Hayward is absurd.
They will not affect his usage. The added depth may decrease his minutes, but that's it.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
Bold prediction: Jazz end up top 5 in the NBA in 3 pt shots taken, 3 pt shots made, and 3 pt percentage.
Bold prediction: Jazz end up top 5 in the NBA in 3 pt shots taken, 3 pt shots made, and 3 pt percentage.
We won't have the slowest pace.
Mack took more shots per minute with the Jazz last year than Hill did with the Pacers.
We won't have the slowest pace.