What's new
By:

The Indispensable Man

Who is most indispensable?

  • Total voters
    82
It's easily Hayward in my opinion. He's our best player and there is no substitute on his roster for what he does. He always fins a way to positively impact the game. Hood is unreliable and Joe's days of carrying an offense are in the past.

Gobert is responsible for our identity, but I have a hard time saying he is our most indespensible player when he's getting benched at the end of games.
 
Easily Gobert. Hayward's production can be replaced somewhat... Nobody can do what Gobert has to offer.
 
KqWIN said:
It's easily Hayward in my opinion. He's our best player and there is no substitute on his roster for what he does. He always fins a way to positively impact the game. Hood is unreliable and Joe's days of carrying an offense are in the past.

Gobert is responsible for our identity, but I have a hard time saying he is our most indespensible player when he's getting benched at the end of games.
Click to expand...

Dude is shooting 80% from the FT line from high school gyms in the pre-preseason. Keep up!
 
No one really. We have no true go to player. I voted Gobert mainly because he's the only one we have no true viable backup for other than another starter (Favors). But really any of the "big 3" going down will now or less be the difference between a possible playoff appearance (and likely first round exit) and another high lottery pick. But in three end it really makes little difference unless you're counting in grades of mediocrity. So the difference between a C- and C+ most likely.
 
LogGrad98 said:
No one really. We have no true go to player. I voted Gobert mainly because he's the only one we have no true viable backup for other than another starter (Favors). But really any of the "big 3" going down will now or less be the difference between a possible playoff appearance (and likely first round exit) and another high lottery pick. But in three end it really makes little difference unless you're counting in grades of mediocrity. So the difference between a C- and C+ most likely.
Click to expand...

debbie downer
 
LogGrad98 said:
But really any of the "big 3" going down will now or less be the difference between a possible playoff appearance (and likely first round exit) and another high lottery pick.
Click to expand...

I don't really see how you can say this. Two of the big 3 went down for a large amount of games last year and we missed the playoffs by a game with much worse depth than we have this year.
 
LogGrad98 said:
No one really. We have no true go to player. I voted Gobert mainly because he's the only one we have no true viable backup for other than another starter (Favors). But really any of the "big 3" going down will now or less be the difference between a possible playoff appearance (and likely first round exit) and another high lottery pick. But in three end it really makes little difference unless you're counting in grades of mediocrity. So the difference between a C- and C+ most likely.
Click to expand...

This shtick would be funnier if it wasn't currently in-use by another popular jazzfanzer. This whole campaign of yours has the originality of when hotttnickkk changed his name to youngblood. So fresh.
 
NAOS said:
This shtick would be funnier if it wasn't currently in-use by another popular jazzfanzer. This whole campaign of yours has the originality of when hotttnickkk changed his name to youngblood. So fresh.
Click to expand...

The real shtick is all of you clearing space on the mantle for the trophy since we added a 35 year old, Diaw and another point guard that might be beaten out by a kid that lost a season to injury. I get the drinking three Kool aid ******** and having some hope for the season but we are still far from being contenders. You guys sound more and more like a religion. Oh no someone has a dissenting opinion. Put your fingers in your ears and LA LA LA all you want. Everything is still prognostication. If anything it's the cultish mantra being "saved" that is the shtick. I think we will have a better season than last year but just because Chad Ford says nice things guarantees nothing. And in the end 4th place is just a higher class loser. Sorry you are so weak in your position that you feel the need to claim dishonesty when someone points this out.
 
LogGrad98 said:
The real shtick is all of you clearing space on the mantle for the trophy since we added a 35 year old, Diaw and another point guard that might be beaten out by a kid that lost a season to injury. I get the drinking three Kool aid ******** and having some hope for the season but we are still far from being contenders. You guys sound more and more like a religion. Oh no someone has a dissenting opinion. Put your fingers in your ears and LA LA LA all you want. Everything is still prognostication. If anything it's the cultish mantra being "saved" that is the shtick. I think we will have a better season than last year but just because Chad Ford says nice things guarantees nothing. And in the end 4th place is just a higher class loser. Sorry you are so weak in your position that you feel the need to claim dishonesty when someone points this out.
Click to expand...

What kind of start to the season will make you drop your pessimism and come to the light side?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top