Kill this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Tend to agree.. haha.. with a legit star in Mitchell, let's go out and get another star to complement him & Gobert this offseason instead.
Kill this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
No, please stop. If the season ended today, would Mitchell be 2nd team all-nba? If no, then he isnt even equal to Gobert.Good to see you catching on.
(He's better than Rudy too)
No, please stop. If the season ended today, would Mitchell be 2nd team all-nba? If no, then he isnt even equal to Gobert.
Sure he may not be the most consistent player, but im guessing his averages for the month put him on top. I love Joe Ingles and his game, but he's not driving by Joel Embiid to the rack. That takes such big balls as a month old, 6'3" rookie it's not even funny. I think he has the biggest impact on the club now and may in the future, consistently challenge a dialed in Rudy for that as well.
The disrespect for what Gobert did last year is astronomical. He was arguably a top 10 player last year.Not even debatable? Please. If they were on different teams and contracts were not an issue, you would not want to trade Gobert for Mitchell? I know I would. And that takes nothing away from Gobert's impact and greatness, but Mitchell dictates what he wants to do with the ball. Gobert can' do that. Simply put, Mitchell plays better basketball.
The disrespect for what Gobert did last year is astronomical. He was arguably a top 10 player last year.
What if they watched the Bulls game where he scored 4 points on 1/10 shooting? I'm sorry, Mitchell had just had too many performances like that to call him the best or 2nd best player. That's not people saying he isnt going to be great. It's just people not getting ahead of themselves unnecessarily.
Like last year, Jazz fans lol'd at the "but Gobert isnt elite because he cant create his own shot" narrative and now some are using it to say Mitchell>Gobert. GTFO
The disrespect for what Gobert did last year is astronomical. He was arguably a top 10 player last year.
Well my reasoning was Joe was more consistent than Mitchell's variance of performance, but when the high end of your variance includes 41 points I guess I have to give that the nod. And if your recall, I had them 3 ranked as 2a, 2b, and 2c which shows how close I had them.Well it took you one game (last night's) to agree that Mitchell is better than Joe. This followed your reasoning that Joe was better because of Mitchell lack of consistency. Where did that reasoning go after just one more game?
Look, I get it, Gobert is great and has proven his eating of souls over time, and it's not cool to bash our players, but gosh, why dismiss my opinion so abruptly considering you changed your mind on Joe and Donovan just a day after we had that discussion?
I think you're being biased. Again.
Let's see what he does in December. Was November a hot streak month, can he duplicate November in December, will he be better even.How about looking at the month of November? (I realize that it' a small sample size, but if we are to rank mitchell, there is only a small sample size.) I'm sure here are nuances to the game in which Ingles excels at that the average fan and myself included, don't pick up on where he excels over Donovan, but I still think Donovan jumps off the screen to an unbiased average fan as the best player on the team. And with the trend where Rudy was going, that includes he as well.