What's new

Donovan Mitchell All Star Weekend Thread

Not every year can be a sick contest. The Lavine/Gordon was the exception, not the rule.

How I would fix the evening:

1. Eliminate the skills challenge. What skills? Run up the ball, throw a pass, run back down, do a layup, run back down, shoot a three pointer? Elementary kids can do that. Ditch it and we're giving that TV time to the dunk contest.

2. Three point contest can stay as is really, don't think it needs retooling.

3. Dunk contest should be eight players. Judges are all former NBA dunk contest winners and DO NOT get to talk to each other. Dunks are each awarded ten points, five based on difficulty, five based on accuracy. Missed dunks, no matter how hard they may be, get one point taken away per miss as consistency matters. After two dunks each, four progress to the second round where that round is entirely composed of a random wheel of past dunks just to gauge who is the best at recreating on the fly and giving the contest some element of chance. Final round of two is two dunks each; you can either repeat the rules from round one or make it a timed round of 90 seconds where each recipient can do as many dunks as they want with whatever level of creativity they want and the judges judge the performance as a whole using the previous scale.
 
Okay, yeah that was the dunk of the night. The double bounce of the backboard was also really good. But none of them put together as good a series of dunks as Donovan did.
This is exacting what I said last night. Some of the other guys had a good dunk or two, but all of Mitchell's were good.
 
I think the award should go to the player with the best dunk of the night. Not sure of the format on how to get there though.
 
There are a lot of guys on this site who have **** on Rubio -- you ought to know that.
Point is LOAP cant be crying about someone being slightly critical of a dunk contest as "how about you support Jazzman" when he was ******** on Rubio last month.
 
Rooting for a guy in a contest as a representative of our team isn't even close to the same as being critical of one of our players who sucked the first three months of the season.
lmao

Everyone was rooting for Donovan dude. No one here rooted against him.

LOAP was saying "if you cant say anything positive, dont say anything at all against a Jazz player", so he was being a hypocrite.
 
Rooting for a guy in a contest as a representative of our team isn't even close to the same as being critical of one of our players who sucked the first three months of the season.
Ya, also being a famous person tweeting about something is different than being a jazzfanzer posting in a jazzfanz thread. (though lop is kinda famous to us lol)
 
lmao

Everyone was rooting for Donovan dude. No one here rooted against him.

LOAP was saying "if you cant say anything positive, dont say anything at all against a Jazz player", so he was being a hypocrite.

The settings are completely different. Just because LoaP didn't say it doesn't mean he didn't possibly imply it..
 
Back
Top