SoUjazzfan
Well-Known Member
I just pray we are still having this discussion a decade from now. (Meaning he's still here.) That will be the catalyst for me.
Alright this post is good. The thought of Donovan holding and kissing an NBA title in a Jazz uniform would be an image that would surpass any the franchise has ever had. The thought of it, is some deep feels. It has to happen.S & M's stats are monolithic. Mitchell doesn't need to chase those records to surpass them in the hearts of Jazz fans.
If he gets the Jazz the ol' golden globe, that would seal it. The victory, the parade, and the trophy would become indelible Jazz images of things that Stockton and Malone never were.
First off, I know, I know but the Donovan Mitchell hype train in Jazz land is real. We are just one year in, I get that, but I think most of us believe in Donovan quite a bit at this point. So I'll ask the question, will Donovan surpass Stockton and Malone's legacy here and be the greatest player in this franchises history? And what will it take for him to surpass them to be the greatest player in franchise history? And will he be the most loved player ever here?
I’ve said it once I’ve said it a million times. Stockton and Malone are the most underrated superstars of all time. Never did they have the roster help they needed to win a chip and on top of that they had to contend with Jordan, the GOAT to end all GOATS in the nba. I personally don’t see him ever reaching the type of numbers Stockton and Malone reached. Is it out of the question? No. But in my mind, if Stockton isn’t the most boring personality in the history of man kind and both he and Malone played for LA or Boston, the Knicks, or let’s face it, anywhere but Utah. They are in the discussion for top 5 all time for their numbers alone, and had there been no Jordan and the Roster Mitchell played with last year, they win at least 5 titles bare minimum. Those two were simply that good.
I love Mitchell, but to say he will surpass the statue’s after just finishing his rookie year is both insulting to Stockton and Malone and unfair to put that on Mitchell. I’m sorry but the fact that this is even a thread and most here are so easily believing this, then you all need a history lesson. Talk to me in 5 years when we can actually accurately answer this absurd question.
I think he was still solid role player 2 years ago with Memphis and looked decent in the playoffs at 40. I am shocked he is heading into his 21st season. He is going to tie for the longest career in NBA history with Parish, Kevin Willis, and Garnett.As for the "more athleticism" issue: The current oldest player in the NBA is Vince Carter. (He's not very good now, sure, but he transitioned his game and was still decent until 4 or 5 years ago)
As far as being the player who can actually take you there though, his window isn’t as wide. Stockton and Malone were 34 and 35 years old going into their first finals appearance and the two of them contending for 2 straight titles. To put that into perspective, Lebron is 33 and people sure pump his age a lot.As for the "more athleticism" issue: The current oldest player in the NBA is Vince Carter. (He's not very good now, sure, but he transitioned his game and was still decent until 4 or 5 years ago)
Look at the the numbers they put up on some cheap weak *** rosters, and how those two made them contenders. They were every bit as good!!top 5 all tim e.lmao. They mha maybeve and I say maybe be ttop 5 all t ime franchise player for Celtics or Lakers but not better then Bird, Bill Russell,kobe, kareem, magic
That’s my point, the players around Stockton and Malone just wasn’t that good. The third guy Horny, love him but he was broken down and couldn’t defend.5 titles. Get real. They couldn't even win one when MJ was off playing baseball. Also back then Eas t was way more supreme then the West. Like it is now but the other way around.
Be a good player, be loyal or be good enough to make allstars be there at least 7 years.I knew I would finally get that type of backlash for even asking the question. I’m not taking anything away from Stockton and Malone, two of the greatest players ever. I believe Mitchell has that capability. I didn’t say I was predicting he is going to pass them.
Maybe this is a more fair question. What does Donovan have to do bare minimum to get #45 retired here? .....more fair?
Well, he's certainly ahead of them, by far, at this stage of their careers. As CP3 said, he has no limits. No matter the stats, because they're based to some extent on longevity, if he can bring championships to the Jazz and be here at least 10 years with All-NBA first team selections, then for sure.
I agree that Stockton and Malone were two of the greatest players ever, with what they had to work with, with what they did, with the numbers they put up, they for sure were. Just because they didn't win a ring doesn't diminish what they did and accomplished.Look at the the numbers they put up on some cheap weak *** rosters, and how those two made them contenders. They were every bit as good!!
That’s my point, the players around Stockton and Malone just wasn’t that good. The third guy Horny, love him but he was broken down and couldn’t defend.
Be a good player, be loyal or be good enough to make allstars be there at least 7 years.
No just no. Stockton started on the bench behind former allstar, Malone had to defer to Dantley, who was one of the leading scorers in the league at the time, all Mitchell had to do was beat a weak minded Hood. Stockton, the first chance he got to start put up 14pts and 13.8 assists round that up to 14. Lol insanity!!! Onece Dantley left Malone put up 21pts and 10reb and shot up from there. Stockton and Malone came into this league every bit as good if not better then Mitchell. The Statues had way more obstacles to overcome then Mitchell did
NoCan he surpass them if he doesn’t win a championship here?