Why not just do Exum for Ariza? That would make more sense than KCP.It is a 1 year deal where Dante is on a 3 year deal.
Why not just do Exum for Ariza? That would make more sense than KCP.It is a 1 year deal where Dante is on a 3 year deal.
If we trade Favors elsewhere, could work brilliantly with our roster. Or maybe we trade a draft pick for Dinwiddie or Rozier and keep Favors.Why not just do Exum for Ariza? That would make more sense than KCP.
Why not get rid of both? I am a Rubio homer, but if people are unhappy with both why not get rid of both?
If the Jazz don't plan to re-sign Rubio, in my opinion they should try to trade him the season.
This story to re-sign good character players that likes to be part of the Jazz has to finish.
Rubio won't make the Jazz a contender.
I worry that Quin will push to re-sign Rubio.
Why not just do Exum for Ariza? That would make more sense than KCP.
People will always be unhappy. They already don't like Mitchell. They've been over Gobert since 2017.
Who are these people that dont like Mitchell or Gobert. I would bet money on it that 90%+ of Jazz fans are happy with either or both. Don't say stuff just to say stuff bro
So you trade Rubio for the sake of trading him. And what if the Jazz strike out on any PG in FA? What if Rubio signs a great team-friendly deal to somebody in the offseason?
I don't see any trade for Rubio that makes sense. Trading just to trade him makes even less sense.
I don't care about the team-friendly deal option. For me Rubio should not be in the Jazz long term plans.
Better to trade him now rather than to lose him for nothing at the end of this season.
Rozier, Dinwiddie, McConnell, othersWho is your alternative?
Who is your alternative?