Red
Well-Known Member
Well, this can't be good....
https://amp.theguardian.com/environ...ng-insect-numbers-threaten-collapse-of-nature
https://amp.theguardian.com/environ...ng-insect-numbers-threaten-collapse-of-nature
Well, this can't be good....
https://amp.theguardian.com/environ...ng-insect-numbers-threaten-collapse-of-nature
Do you actually read the stuff you link?
the article is a news report based on a peer-reviewed article published in a professional journal of "science" dedicated to a political agenda..... fear mongering about whatever evils the government needs to be given power to avert.
There's a sort of cult following that is growing
and, yes, speaking of "Red Flags".... Red's article contains a real red flag.... the "review" was based on "the best" articles the writer could find.... about 73 "selected" articles which showed obvious value for running out this thesis in the most alarming way he could.
that's not real science, bro.
And you're no authority. But you pretend to be one, on every subject known to man.
Yep. All of his posts can be sumnarized with "you shouldn't believe (blank). You should believe me."
There's zero point in reading anything he writes.
bugs have proven, across many eras of earth history and whatever extinction events, to be survivors. millions of varieties, incredible massive numbers....they dominate "Life" on earth.
I am reporting your post, Red, to globalist Colton and Master Jason, who run this little political site, as a "star performance" for which they should immediately reward you as worthy of another "red star".
This is true. The Cenozoic has been called the Age of Mammals, but you can easily make a case for the Age of Insects.
However, I found your initial comment to this thread to be flat out bonkers. And it just seemed like you were actually angry that scientists are reporting this trend. Which is downright bizarre. That science would anger you so much. Or that you would claim a political agenda for their conclusions. I'm sorry, bro, but that's nuts. And I don't say that lightly, because I'm into some crazy **** myself at times, but that was out there.
That's very kind of you, I'm sure. But what you really need to do is touch base with something resembling reality. Keep it up, and I'm gonna start feeling sorry for ya.
Seriously, get a grip. You're consumed by way too much nonsense. Come back to Earth. Why rail like that? It's only science, they're not lying to you in the service of any agenda. If you thought the article was alarmist, you should listen to yourself sometime.
That initial comment was in that tone simply because I was replying to one of your reports, which I believe can reliably be considered "political", not "scientific" in nature. I mean, for sure, you wouldn't be dragging it in here for the sake of pure science.
Look, I don't really want to be just trolling the lib loonies. It is of interest to me to see what others have to say..... about.... crazy stuff.
I would like to crush you like a bug.
I had planned on making similar comments (with my own brand of loony, horse apples, thank you very much) after reading almost the whole article, only to read the final paragraph and then intellectually wince:
“Sánchez-Bayo said he had recently witnessed an insect crash himself. A recent family holiday involved a 400-mile (700km) drive across rural Australia, but he had not once had to clean the windscreen, he said. “Years ago you had to do this constantly.”
I bet counting the current bugs in existence and then comparing that number with the number of bugs in existence is pretty difficult to do.I can’t believe I’m saying this, but strip away the loony, horse apple, nonsense (approximately 98% of his post), and I actually agree with babe.
I had planned on making similar comments (with my own brand of loony, horse apples, thank you very much) after reading almost the whole article, only to read the final paragraph and then intellectually wince:
“Sánchez-Bayo said he had recently witnessed an insect crash himself. A recent family holiday involved a 400-mile (700km) drive across rural Australia, but he had not once had to clean the windscreen, he said. “Years ago you had to do this constantly.”
You want proof? There you have it.
What exactly that proves is up for interpretation. I personally thought it was the icing on the cake for that ridiculous, fear mongering, sack of dung. What sucks is that there probably IS a big problem with insect decline, and it may very well have much to do with global warming/AG, but that cute little article did nothing but placate the people who are already on the GW bandwagon, push the detractors even farther away, and (in my case anyway) make people who are on the fence, or not sure if they’re comfortable with where the left has been going the last decade or so, actually lean further right.
In other words, it was trash. I’m going to go take a shower now. I feel super gross.
Same for me when I go camping and fishing. It's nice to be honest lol.I'm out in nature a majority of my days and if you ask me I see less bugs than I used to. Not too scientific but that's my observation.