What's new
By:

Compelling Pro Life Argument

fishonjazz said:
Well then I'm more pro life than I already thought I was.

I haven't felt that pro lifers take that stance very often though. I have usually felt that they take the stance of making abortion illegal. For all. In every circumstance. Maybe I have been misunderstanding though.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Like everything there is a spectrum.
 
fishonjazz said:
Well then I'm more pro life than I already thought I was.

I haven't felt that pro lifers take that stance very often though. I have usually felt that they take the stance of making abortion illegal. For all. In every circumstance. Maybe I have been misunderstanding though.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Its easy to misunderstand when you only listen to the left.
 
Stoked said:
Not really. You can’t force someone to adopt someone. How do you address that?
Click to expand...

My apologies for being unclear. My point was that forcing more babies tobe born would not necessarily have a great impact on the waiting-to-adopt roles, due to the selectiveness of the people on the waiting list.
 
One Brow said:
My apologies for being unclear. My point was that forcing more babies tobe born would not necessarily have a great impact on the waiting-to-adopt roles, due to the selectiveness of the people on the waiting list.
Click to expand...

Ah. Ok.
 
One Brow said:
Except when it comes to abortion.
Click to expand...

Nah. I changed my mind.

I thought it made sense that if a women was brutally raped that she should be able to have an immediate abortion upon realizing she is pregnant. But after careful thought I think she should have to have the baby. Its disgusting to kill a baby regardless of circumstances.

See. Im not rigid in my stances. You can change my mind.
 
One Brow said:
Does it matter that there is no other activity, legal or illegal, where we force the person performing their activity to give up any part of their body for the use of another person? Even if you stab someone in their kidneys, you can't be force to donate a lock of hair, much less a kidney. However, women are forced to make their wombs available. Sex requires more dire consequences than stabbing someone?
Click to expand...
This makes no sense. So you are saying the fetus needs to get consent to use the womb? Or what exactly? Sounds like you are trying to say that we arbitrarily decided that women should get pregnant and that we need to stop forcing women to get pregnant. Huh? It's a natural biological result of the action of intercourse, pregnancy is not a social construct. If you mean rape we already said that is a completely different situation. But choosing to have sex can and often does result in pregnancy. I really don't see what your argument is.
 
jimmy eat jazz said:
One way the Left could help promote adoptions is to remove objections to religious-based adoption agencies that use religious criteria to place children. My brother adopted 3 children through the LDS Church, which is no longer, I believe, offering this service due in part to this issue. (I could be wrong.) I do believe that laws that encourage women to carry to term and place children in adoption should be promoted.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Adoption is awesome. I’ve never heard of anyone objecting to religious based adoptions. I have 2 adopted children so I’m kinda living in that world. Where did you hear this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top