What's new
By:

You're the GM this offseason. What do you do?

stitches said:
Yeah, I'm not super confident in either, but I feel like Oubre is a younger version with better physical profile and I think there is unexplored potential in him. He's always been on dysfunctional teams and he was starting to figure it out before the end of the season with Igor. I think he's probably going to cost less than Lamb and if we are going to be betting on a non-premium talent, I'd rather go for the younger one that probably has higher upside.
Click to expand...

Just so much garbage time that I'm not sure I trust the numbers behind him "figuring it out". I get the argument for him more than guys like Rozier.

If we get to the "make an big offer to Kelly Oubre" portion of the offseason I am likely already disappointed with the summer.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I mean, Favors had a 4.3 BPM last year. It sucks he can't play more because of the fit issues, but he's a huge part of the Jazz's success. I dont think guys like Bjelica, Mirotic, etc are upgrades over him even though they are better fits.

*If* the max free agents are off the table the answer should be to keep Favors, target Lamb as the 2nd scoring option, and try to add some vet pieces.
Click to expand...

So we'd basically be keeping the same team except replacing Rubio with Lamb and maybe replacing Sefelosha and Udoh with other cheap vets. Does that really move the needle? Does it get us any closer to the Rockets or Warriors? Does it even make us better than the Nuggets or Blazers? I just don't see it.
 
One thing as I look back on the season that sticks out to me... How the hell are we so good when Neto is on the court. Must be some flukey **** with his on/off numbers... I think he played a little more once the schedule eased up, but some of his lineup data is just insane to me. Makes me wonder... If we had an average, but solid and steady NBA point guard how good are we? Like DJ Augustine level of player.

I think Ricky is good, but his inconsistency and some of his particular flaws (turnover prone, bad shooting, uneven defense) make a more vanilla option more palatable.
 
Jingled said:
So we'd basically be keeping the same team except replacing Rubio with Lamb and maybe replacing Sefelosha and Udoh with other cheap vets. Does that really move the needle? Does it get us any closer to the Rockets or Warriors? Does it even make us better than the Nuggets or Blazers? I just don't see it.
Click to expand...
The only thing that moves the needle to get us closer to those teams is Chris Paul aging and Kevin Durant leaving.
 
NUMBERICA said:
There are more than 5 guys worth signing. There are dozens of options better than being the last team to believe in a basketball philosophy that has been roundly disproven as a true winning strategy.

I’ll be happy for a handful more of 50-win seasons, no trips to the WCF or beyond, and Gobert and Mitchell bouncing if the Jazz show some steel for ****ing once. If they don’t, then those results don’t really mean **** to me. Furthermore, I am entirely skeptical that Favors really improves the team that much given the known-issues with the fit.
Click to expand...
Yeah and you can sign one of those guys for 18 mill or less.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
And if Tony's sources are right, then that probably means the Jazz dont think they can sign one of the big target max guys.
Click to expand...
I think that writing was on the wall as soon as DL tried to get Conley in exchange for all that flexibility he's been telling us is so important for 4-5 years.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Uhh, there's nothing about Favors holding the team back. The Jazz were a 50 win team with him and Rubio. Yes, I think ideally it would be best to replace both with shooters who better fit the team, but it might be possible to only do one or the other. The Jazz upgrade from Rubio while keeping Favors, and you could have a 55+ win team on your hands.
Click to expand...
If we keep Favors, I see our ceiling upgrade as a Darren Collison. Yes, we could win a few more games, but ultimately my qualifier was "take us to the next step," of which I don't think a middling PG acquisition qualifies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top