What's new

You're the GM this offseason. What do you do?

You’re wrong. Those are still MOVES - they are still decisions that need to be made. What don’t you get about that? Who will be the starting PG? That question needs to be addressed. So yes, it will be a move.

Get it?

Now you carry on.
 
Also, for all the "value-based" discussion, we're going to have Favors and Exum occupying $30M of the cap.
 
When I listened to his pod I thought "I'll bet @infection wouldn't love this". A lot of "value based" talk. Just gave me the impression he may not pivot to second tier guys if we miss on the Tobias, Dlo types... like they are overly concerned with getting value and FA isn't a place you find a lot of value contracts unless it is guys like Royce... generally you are overpaying for the production you will get.
The only ting that will please infcection is trading every asset the Jazz have for Nikola Mirotic
 
You’re wrong. Those are still MOVES - they are still decisions that need to be made. What don’t you get about that? Who will be the starting PG? That question needs to be addressed. So yes, it will be a move.

Get it?

Now you carry on.
Lol so every GM in the league literally has to make a move this off season.
Great point.
Simmer down youngster

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
The only ting that will please infcection is trading every asset the Jazz have for Nikola Mirotic

Nah he’s reasonable. I think he wants pieces that make sense around Rudy and DM. He loved Niko... I think he’s actually going to be appropriately valued in FA now and it’d be a good time to get him if other better players don’t work out.
 
Nah he’s reasonable. I think he wants pieces that make sense around Rudy and DM. He loved Niko... I think he’s actually going to be appropriately valued in FA now and it’d be a good time to get him if other better players don’t work out.
Exactly. He's easily gettable now. The ludicrous trade ideas infection was crying about would have been a total waste.
 
Exactly. He's easily gettable now. The ludicrous trade ideas infection was crying about would have been a total waste.
Like giving up the chance at Grayson for him, and having a good look at him in our system the past 1.5 years? What was I thinking?
 
Like giving up the chance at Grayson for him, and having a good look at him in our system the past 1.5 years? What was I thinking?
1. Grayson is going to be a solid rotation player (you also had no idea the pick was going to be Grayson so stfu)
2. Mirotic being in our system most likely makes him look better and causes him to cost more ala George Hill
 
1. Grayson is going to be a solid rotation player (you also had no idea the pick was going to be Grayson so stfu)
2. Mirotic being in our system most likely makes him look better and causes him to cost more ala George Hill
Those are kind of silly reasons, though. Maybe we should have just waited for George Hill free agency to begin with.

ETA: Also, regarding Grayson, I kept saying we weren't going to suck. When everyone was eyeballing a top 3 pick, I attempted (without luck) to clue people into reality regarding us bouncing back when Rudy returned. I don't ride with the perceived highs and lows.
 
Those are kind of silly reasons, though. Maybe we should have just waited for George Hill free agency to begin with.

ETA: Also, regarding Grayson, I kept saying we weren't going to suck. When everyone was eyeballing a top 3 pick, I attempted (without luck) to clue people into reality regarding us bouncing back when Rudy returned. I don't ride with the perceived highs and lows.
I think you could easily argue the Jazz should have waited for Hill, but the timeline didnt allow it with Hayward's pending free agency.
 
And again, if the Jazz trade for Mirotic in that year, they might have missed the playoffs due to Mirotic being complete *** for the first month after being traded. Your complaint about the Grayson pick is completely ludicrous because the occurrence of the trade would likely affect W/L total and the pick would have likely been different.
 
I think you could easily argue the Jazz should have waited for Hill, but the timeline didnt allow it with Hayward's pending free agency.
Almost every move you could have waited on in hindsight, though. Like, it would make more sense to have kept the OKC pick and signed Rubio this off-season.
 
And again, if the Jazz trade for Mirotic in that year, they might have missed the playoffs due to Mirotic being complete *** for the first month after being traded. Your complaint about the Grayson pick is completely ludicrous because the occurrence of the trade would likely affect W/L total and the pick would have likely been different.
Sure, but was Mirotic being "complete ***" for a month something that would have played out completely the same regardless of scenario? Is it destiny?
 
Top