What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

I also recommend you read these two articles about Trump administration policies towards asylum seekers who present themselves at legal border crossings:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/5/17428640/border-families-asylum-illegal
https://www.apnews.com/5a157e8bcbc3487e8c08348bede3e1ed

But some immigrants who try to seek asylum the “right way” are being turned away and told there’s no room for them now. And there’s evidence that border agents are physically blocking some asylum seekers from setting foot on US soil — in other words, from triggering a legal right to claim asylum in the US — to begin with.

^^^ This is just wrong, how can you block people from trying to do it legally.
 
You've also admitted youre biased and simply dont approve of Trump's demeanor, and therefore anything he does should be held against him.

If you weren't biased you wouldn't pass along myths such as the thousands of missing children nonsense, or sensationalize everything border security related like the leftist radicals are.

People keep questioning why nobody comments specifically on the bullet points in your list. The reason is because it reads like those anti-Obama emails that old men used to pass on. Call me odd but I voted for Obama's 2nd term because of the ridiculous outrage thrown his way and I'll vote a 2nd Trump for the same reason. TBh, I shouldn't read JF anymore cuz y'alls TDS made me a Trump voter.

AMEN!
 
I don’t follow politics much tbh but it’s insane how much hate presidents get based on their party. Obama received a lot of unwarranted hate as well.

The amount of hate that Bush and Obama was unwarranted. Bush and Obama were decent human beings and highly flawed presidents.

Trump is a category all to himself. On every dimension. Historically incompetent and amoral.
 
You've also admitted youre biased and simply dont approve of Trump's demeanor, and therefore anything he does should be held against him.

What the heck? I'm not biased against Trump because of his demeanor. I'm anti Trump because of items like post 1 and post 3 of this thread.
 
Plenty of misdemeanors don't result in jail time. It's especially troubling that you are comfortable imprisoning someone with a valid claim of asylum over what would amount to a technicality. Very cool and normal.

What you’re saying sounds good. Every crime that was committed with good purpose behind it should lessen the crime.
 
Plenty of misdemeanors don't result in jail time. It's especially troubling that you are comfortable imprisoning someone with a valid claim of asylum over what would amount to a technicality. Very cool and normal.

My family is starving but I can’t make ends meet money wise. It’s ok for me to rob a store to get food right?
 
What you’re saying sounds good. Every crime that was committed with good purpose behind it should lessen the crime.
Sounds good to me. I'm comfortable with judges taking circumstances into account when sentencing those who break the law.

People are found guilty of misdemeanors every day without jail time. Again, this isn't that hard.
 
Sounds good to me. I'm comfortable with judges taking circumstances into account when sentencing those who break the law.

People are found guilty of misdemeanors every day without jail time. Again, this isn't that hard.

Some crimes are worse than others, smart one. Crossing the border illegally shouldn’t be taken lightly.
 
But some immigrants who try to seek asylum the “right way” are being turned away and told there’s no room for them now. And there’s evidence that border agents are physically blocking some asylum seekers from setting foot on US soil — in other words, from triggering a legal right to claim asylum in the US — to begin with.

^^^ This is just wrong, how can you block people from trying to do it legally.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino...blocking-people-seeking-asylum-report-n754416

In a statement at that time, Nicole Ramos of the Latin America Working Group said that she had escorted 68 asylum seekers to a port of entry and witnessed CBP officers, supervisors and private security guards try to turn people seeking asylum away or deny them an interview.

“I have heard all of these officers state that a person cannot seek asylum at a port-of-entry; that they must go to the consulate or the embassy; that they simply do not qualify; ... that asylum is no longer available, that they can only apply at one single port of entry,” Ramos stated then.

Leah Chavla, a program officer with the Women’s Refugee Commission, said such denials are continuing to happen. She said she and a colleague interviewed a number of migrants in Texas and northern Mexico last month and “I’m able to tell you there are people who have been turned back.”
...
Human Rights First pointed out in its report that Trump acknowledged U.S. obligations to asylum seekers in his anti-terrorism executive order of March 6. The order states that nothing in the order should “limit the ability of an individual seeking asylum … consistent with the laws of the United States.”

But the groups say that's not what is happening on the ground.

Human Rights First reported that the rhetoric and policies of the Trump administration have emboldened agents to throw up barriers when people request asylum when they seek it at the border.

For example, in February, the family of a youth who was killed by Mara Salvatrucha after a U.S. immigration judge denied his asylum, requested asylum at the Hidalgo, Texas, port of entry.

According to Human Rights First, a border officer told them “You cannot be here, no Hondurans. If you don’t leave I will have to use force to remove you.” When the family tried a second time, CBP agents forcibly removed the family and forced them to return to Mexico.
 
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino...blocking-people-seeking-asylum-report-n754416

In a statement at that time, Nicole Ramos of the Latin America Working Group said that she had escorted 68 asylum seekers to a port of entry and witnessed CBP officers, supervisors and private security guards try to turn people seeking asylum away or deny them an interview.

“I have heard all of these officers state that a person cannot seek asylum at a port-of-entry; that they must go to the consulate or the embassy; that they simply do not qualify; ... that asylum is no longer available, that they can only apply at one single port of entry,” Ramos stated then.

Leah Chavla, a program officer with the Women’s Refugee Commission, said such denials are continuing to happen. She said she and a colleague interviewed a number of migrants in Texas and northern Mexico last month and “I’m able to tell you there are people who have been turned back.”
...
Human Rights First pointed out in its report that Trump acknowledged U.S. obligations to asylum seekers in his anti-terrorism executive order of March 6. The order states that nothing in the order should “limit the ability of an individual seeking asylum … consistent with the laws of the United States.”

But the groups say that's not what is happening on the ground.

Human Rights First reported that the rhetoric and policies of the Trump administration have emboldened agents to throw up barriers when people request asylum when they seek it at the border.

For example, in February, the family of a youth who was killed by Mara Salvatrucha after a U.S. immigration judge denied his asylum, requested asylum at the Hidalgo, Texas, port of entry.

According to Human Rights First, a border officer told them “You cannot be here, no Hondurans. If you don’t leave I will have to use force to remove you.” When the family tried a second time, CBP agents forcibly removed the family and forced them to return to Mexico.

I’m not stupid and blindly follow someone. Like I said I don’t follow politics that much I like looking at things objectively. Things like this is very wrong any normal person can see that.
 
Some crimes are worse than others, smart one. Crossing the border illegally shouldn’t be taken lightly.
(again for those reading this is a hypothetical, it is NOT illegal to cross the border when seeking asylum)

Crossing the border to seek a legally protected status because you are fleeing for your life is not a particularly serious offense to those with, you know, a conscience.
 
You've also admitted youre biased and simply dont approve of Trump's demeanor, and therefore anything he does should be held against him.

If you weren't biased you wouldn't pass along myths such as the thousands of missing children nonsense, or sensationalize everything border security related like the leftist radicals are.

People keep questioning why nobody comments specifically on the bullet points in your list. The reason is because it reads like those anti-Obama emails that old men used to pass on. Call me odd but I voted for Obama's 2nd term because of the ridiculous outrage thrown his way and I'll vote a 2nd Trump for the same reason. TBh, I shouldn't read JF anymore cuz y'alls TDS made me a Trump voter.
This type of thing is so ****in funny to me.
 
Top