Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Lol.
Watch this and you'll see the difference of intelligence between Shapiro and his counterparts.
This was hard to watch. Gawd damn it.
I guarantee he'd tested (or would test) higher than you on the ACT, LSAT, IQ, SAT, or any other intelligence test. You guys sound intimidated or jealous. 176, yo.
Lol.
Watch this and you'll see the difference of intelligence between Shapiro and his counterparts.
This was hard to watch. Gawd damn it.
I don't know much about any of them so I'll definitely start paying closer attention.I don't think AOC is right about everything either. Of course I find myself agreeing with a lot of what she believes politically.
As for your second question, I think Elizabeth Warren is a good example of someone who is both well educated and good at supporting her positions. As far as political pundits go Ta Nehesi Coates is someone I would consider an intellectual heavyweight.
Natalie Wynn of ContraPoints is another individual who I think is very good at crafting and supporting her positions. In her videos she takes a socratic approach and represents multiple points of views to analyze a particular issue. Rather than seeking to "destroy" the other point of view, she attempts to understand it. I highly recommend her youtube channel.
So, you'd still expect 3-4 people out of a thousand to get that score. It's not all that amazing.
Wait, are you seriously saying that scoring in the .04% on the LSAT isn't that amazing? Mmmkay. . I must be odd then cause that sounds impressive af to me.
There's an intelligence understanding that other people can be intelligent with or without your approval.
I haven't received many responses to my first post and this thread has turned into a bit of a ****-show, but I would encourage you all to listen to the last 3 minutes of the OP video to get where I am coming from.
I enjoy the JRE podcast and was introduced to the 'Sunday Special' of Shapiro when I saw him interviewing Andrew Yang a Democratic nominee ---->
I would like to see more of this in-depth, long-form discussion and less of the garbage we see today.
I’m not sure about that. Both he and Tulsi Gabbard, though they may hold a lot of views that go significantly against any baseline right-wing dogma, they themselves aren’t hyper-partisan and haven’t really engaged in much us-vs.-them energizing of their perceived base. As such, they’ve been more willing to engage in discussion that doesn’t fall back on strong appeal to emotion. I’ve been familiar with both of them through Joe Rogan and held favorable views of them despite not agreeing with a number of their positions. My assumption is that their receptivity among the right probably mirrors a lot of my own thoughts.Right wing media has been very fair to Andrew Yang - either they don't take him seriously or they hope he'll become a third party candidate and take votes away from the democratic candidate (the latter of which he said he's not going to do). Regardless, credit where credit is due - Shapiro does an excellent job here.
I also enjoyed his interview with Sam Harris. In fact I think that's what Shapiro is trying to reinvent himself as - sort of a right leaning, non-secular Sam Harris.