What's new

2020 Presidential election

Why am I being mentioned here? Whoever you’re responding to I have on ignore and I’m not going to reveal their posts to read their crap. But it’s interesting that in response to a campaign slanderous attack ad against AOC shown on ABC, the person you’re arguing with has more of an issue with my posting than with the ad. Quite telling.
It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.

And I agree, to a point. I really don't understand why this has turned into yet another Stoked vs Thriller conversation. They're getting a bit tedious.
 
Lol, until I’m shown legit arguments otherwise...

It’s not like I’m saying don’t be critical of the GOP. It’s poster specific.

Convince me.

Honest question.

If you saw what you considered “hate” that was posted constantly and went unchallenged would you speak up?
I mean, it does go challenged. I've disagreed with him plenty. I think you are mistaking "posts by Thriller I disagree with" with spamming and trolling.
 
It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.

And I agree, to a point. I really don't understand why this has turned into yet another Stoked vs Thriller conversation. They're getting a bit tedious.

So is the constant political hate.
 
I mean, it does go challenged. I've disagreed with him plenty. I think you are mistaking "posts by Thriller I disagree with" with spamming and trolling.

Disagreeing with a post isn’t the same.

If a poster came on here and was like “**** women” would you be like “I disagree” or would you push back harder?

Again, back to point.

What the ****? I’m clearly the outlier. I realize I’m on an island, alone. I like to grow, learn and improve. So what am I missing? I truly dont see it
 
It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.

And I agree, to a point. I really don't understand why this has turned into yet another Stoked vs Thriller conversation. They're getting a bit tedious.

I thought we’d discuss the ad and how it’s unbelievably inappropriate. Or how so many in right have an unreal obsession with AOC? Or how we have no idea what socialism means anymore. It’s just a “scary” word republicans throw out to label anything they disagree with?

Well, I haven’t engaged with stoked in weeks. I even sent him a private message maybe a month ago to stop trying to talk to me. I then put him on ignore. So if these stoked vs thriller conversations are becoming tedious, it’s because one poster is bringing it up, not me.

Like those with an unhealthy fetish with AOC (maybe because deep down they know she’s right?), maybe those with an unhealthy obsession with me can just let it go? Or just put me on ignore? I’ve done it and I never look back. I lose nothing by ignoring posters who make reading this forum tedious or frustrating.
 
Disagreeing with a post isn’t the same.

If a poster came on here and was like “**** women” would you be like “I disagree” or would you push back harder?

Again, back to point.

What the ****? I’m clearly the outlier. I realize I’m on an island, alone. I like to grow, learn and improve. So what am I missing? I truly dont see it
I'm really not that interested to have this conversation. You're allowed to have your own opinions of the guy. I do think it's a little obsessive that you keep bringing it up, especially on posts of his that aren't objectionable in the least.
 
I'm really not that interested to have this conversation. You're allowed to have your own opinions of the guy. I do think it's a little obsessive that you keep bringing it up, especially on posts of his that aren't objectionable in the least.

So is spamming GD 24/7 with anti trump. The Heathme of the left.

**** him and his hate.

Again, I’ve been provided no rebuttal

In another week I’ll challenge someone else to be disappointed.
 
I thought we’d discuss the ad and how it’s unbelievably inappropriate. Or how so many in right have an unreal obsession with AOC? Or how we have no idea what socialism means anymore. It’s just a “scary” word republicans throw out to label anything they disagree with?

Well, I haven’t engaged with stoked in weeks. I even sent him a private message maybe a month ago to stop trying to talk to me. I then put him on ignore. So if these stoked vs thriller conversations are becoming tedious, it’s because one poster is bringing it up, not me.

Like those with an unhealthy fetish with AOC (maybe because deep down they know she’s right?), maybe those with an unhealthy obsession with me can just let it go? Or just put me on ignore? I’ve done it and I never look back. I lose nothing by ignoring posters who make reading this forum tedious or frustrating.
It's nuts to me that someone created that ad, and ABC ran it. It's one of the most disgusting political ads I've seen, and it's not like she's in the middle of a campaign or anything, so it's very random. But yeah, the right absolutely has a some sort of creepy obsession with her.
 
So is spamming GD 24/7 with anti trump. The Heathme of the left.

**** him and his hate.

Again, I’ve been provided no rebuttal

In another week I’ll challenge someone else to be disappointed.
Being anti Trump, or talking about things the GOP is doing that you find abhorrent isn't "hate."

Look, if you are tired of reading criticism of the ridiculous **** going on from the right in the country right now, you don't have to open these threads.

Heathme's problem isn't that he posts a lot, it's that what he posts is a lot of garbage.
 
Back
Top